With the change to the AVX512 find_last_set implementation, the change
to AVX512 operator!= is unnecessary. However, the latter was not
producing optimal code and unnecessarily set the padding bits. In
theory, the compiler could determine that with the new !=
implementation, the bit operation for clearing the padding bits is a
no-op and can be elided.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Kretz <m.kretz@gsi.de>
libstdc++-v3/ChangeLog:
PR libstdc++/115454
* include/experimental/bits/simd_x86.h (_S_not_equal_to): Use
neq comparison instead of bitwise negation after eq.
(_S_find_last_set): Clear unused high bits before computing
bit_width.
* testsuite/experimental/simd/pr115454_find_last_set.cc: New
test.
(cherry picked from commit 1340ddea01)
fbd088a069