git
/
gcc
mirror of git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

extend.texi (Compound Literals): Add '@' missed in last commit. 

gcc/ChangeLog:
	* doc/extend.texi (Compound Literals): Add '@' missed in last commit.

From-SVN: r238652
This commit is contained in:
Martin Sebor 2016-07-22 16:16:17 +00:00 committed by Martin Sebor
parent e040f9bd4b
commit 9d04a3af4c
2 changed files with 5 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
gcc/ChangeLog
View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
2016-07-22 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
* doc/extend.texi (Compound Literals): Add '@' missed in last commit.
2016-07-22 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com> 2016-07-22 Martin Sebor <msebor@redhat.com>
PR c/71560 PR c/71560

2
gcc/doc/extend.texi
View File

@ -1956,7 +1956,7 @@ because the lifetime of the array ends after the declaration of @code{foo}.
As an optimization, G++ sometimes gives array compound literals longer As an optimization, G++ sometimes gives array compound literals longer
lifetimes: when the array either appears outside a function or has lifetimes: when the array either appears outside a function or has
a @code{const}-qualified type. If @code{foo} and its initializer had a @code{const}-qualified type. If @code{foo} and its initializer had
elements of type @code{char *const} rather than code{char *}, or if elements of type @code{char *const} rather than @code{char *}, or if
@code{foo} were a global variable, the array would have static storage @code{foo} were a global variable, the array would have static storage
duration. But it is probably safest just to avoid the use of array duration. But it is probably safest just to avoid the use of array
compound literals in C++ code. compound literals in C++ code.