mirror of git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
README.Portability: Move to a new section and obsolete K+R portability issues.
* README.Portability: Move to a new section and obsolete K+R portability issues. From-SVN: r65818
This commit is contained in:
parent
070154442e
commit
ced2ad7687
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
|
|||
2003-04-19 Matt Kraai <kraai@alumni.cmu.edu>
|
||||
|
||||
* README.Portability: Move to a new section and obsolete K+R
|
||||
portability issues.
|
||||
|
||||
Sat Apr 19 14:56:17 CEST 2003 Jan Hubicka <jh@suse.cz>
|
||||
|
||||
* rtlanal.c (subreg_offset_representable_p): Fix call of
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
|||
Copyright (C) 2000 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
Copyright (C) 2000, 2003 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
|
||||
|
||||
This file is intended to contain a few notes about writing C code
|
||||
within GCC so that it compiles without error on the full range of
|
||||
|
|
@ -15,42 +15,13 @@ probably what most people code to naturally. Obviously using
|
|||
constructs introduced after that is not a good idea.
|
||||
|
||||
The first section of this file deals strictly with portability issues,
|
||||
the second with common coding pitfalls.
|
||||
the second with common coding pitfalls, and the third with obsolete
|
||||
K+R portability issues.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Portability Issues
|
||||
==================
|
||||
|
||||
Unary +
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C compilers and preprocessors have no notion of unary '+'. Thus
|
||||
the following code snippet contains 2 portability problems.
|
||||
|
||||
int x = +2; /* int x = 2; */
|
||||
#if +1 /* #if 1 */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Pointers to void
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C compilers did not have a void pointer, and used char * as the
|
||||
pointer to anything. The macro PTR is defined as either void * or
|
||||
char * depending on whether you have a standards compliant compiler or
|
||||
a K+R one. Thus
|
||||
|
||||
free ((void *) h->value.expansion);
|
||||
|
||||
should be written
|
||||
|
||||
free ((PTR) h->value.expansion);
|
||||
|
||||
Further, an initial investigation indicates that pointers to functions
|
||||
returning void are okay. Thus the example given by "Calling functions
|
||||
through pointers to functions" below appears not to cause a problem.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
String literals
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -61,14 +32,9 @@ const char string[] = ("A string");
|
|||
This is unfortunate since this is what the GNU gettext macro N_
|
||||
produces. You need to find a different way to code it.
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C did not allow concatenation of string literals like
|
||||
|
||||
"This is a " "single string literal".
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, some compilers like MSVC++ have fairly low limits on the
|
||||
maximum length of a string literal; 509 is the lowest we've come
|
||||
across. You may need to break up a long printf statement into many
|
||||
smaller ones.
|
||||
Some compilers like MSVC++ have fairly low limits on the maximum
|
||||
length of a string literal; 509 is the lowest we've come across. You
|
||||
may need to break up a long printf statement into many smaller ones.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Empty macro arguments
|
||||
|
|
@ -88,140 +54,6 @@ foo (bar, )
|
|||
needs to be coded in some other way.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
signed keyword
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
The signed keyword did not exist in K+R compilers; it was introduced
|
||||
in ISO C89, so you cannot use it. In both K+R and standard C,
|
||||
unqualified char and bitfields may be signed or unsigned. There is no
|
||||
way to portably declare signed chars or signed bitfields.
|
||||
|
||||
All other arithmetic types are signed unless you use the 'unsigned'
|
||||
qualifier. For instance, it is safe to write
|
||||
|
||||
short paramc;
|
||||
|
||||
instead of
|
||||
|
||||
signed short paramc;
|
||||
|
||||
If you have an algorithm that depends on signed char or signed
|
||||
bitfields, you must find another way to write it before it can be
|
||||
integrated into GCC.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Function prototypes
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
You need to provide a function prototype for every function before you
|
||||
use it, and functions must be defined K+R style. The function
|
||||
prototype should use the PARAMS macro, which takes a single argument.
|
||||
Therefore the parameter list must be enclosed in parentheses. For
|
||||
example,
|
||||
|
||||
int myfunc PARAMS ((double, int *));
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
myfunc (var1, var2)
|
||||
double var1;
|
||||
int *var2;
|
||||
{
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
This implies that if the function takes no arguments, it should be
|
||||
declared and defined as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
int myfunc PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
myfunc ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
You also need to use PARAMS when referring to function protypes in
|
||||
other circumstances, for example see "Calling functions through
|
||||
pointers to functions" below.
|
||||
|
||||
Variable-argument functions are best described by example:-
|
||||
|
||||
void cpp_ice PARAMS ((cpp_reader *, const char *msgid, ...));
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
cpp_ice VPARAMS ((cpp_reader *pfile, const char *msgid, ...))
|
||||
{
|
||||
VA_OPEN (ap, msgid);
|
||||
VA_FIXEDARG (ap, cpp_reader *, pfile);
|
||||
VA_FIXEDARG (ap, const char *, msgid);
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
VA_CLOSE (ap);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
See ansidecl.h for the definitions of the above macros and more.
|
||||
|
||||
One aspect of using K+R style function declarations, is you cannot
|
||||
have arguments whose types are char, short, or float, since without
|
||||
prototypes (ie, K+R rules), these types are promoted to int, int, and
|
||||
double respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
Calling functions through pointers to functions
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C compilers require parentheses around the dereferenced function
|
||||
pointer expression in the call, whereas ISO C relaxes the syntax. For
|
||||
example
|
||||
|
||||
typedef void (* cl_directive_handler) PARAMS ((cpp_reader *, const char *));
|
||||
*p->handler (pfile, p->arg);
|
||||
|
||||
needs to become
|
||||
|
||||
(*p->handler) (pfile, p->arg);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Macros
|
||||
------
|
||||
|
||||
The rules under K+R C and ISO C for achieving stringification and
|
||||
token pasting are quite different. Therefore some macros have been
|
||||
defined which will get it right depending upon the compiler.
|
||||
|
||||
CONCAT2(a,b) CONCAT3(a,b,c) and CONCAT4(a,b,c,d)
|
||||
|
||||
will paste the tokens passed as arguments. You must not leave any
|
||||
space around the commas. Also,
|
||||
|
||||
STRINGX(x)
|
||||
|
||||
will stringify an argument; to get the same result on K+R and ISO
|
||||
compilers x should not have spaces around it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Passing structures by value
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
Avoid passing structures by value, either to or from functions. It
|
||||
seems some K+R compilers handle this differently or not at all.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Enums
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
In K+R C, you have to cast enum types to use them as integers, and
|
||||
some compilers in particular give lots of warnings for using an enum
|
||||
as an array index.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bitfields
|
||||
---------
|
||||
|
||||
See also "signed keyword" above. In K+R C only unsigned int bitfields
|
||||
were defined (i.e. unsigned char, unsigned short, unsigned long.
|
||||
Using plain int/short/long was not allowed).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
free and realloc
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -232,37 +64,16 @@ pointer. Thus if mem might be null, you need to write
|
|||
free (mem);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reserved Keywords
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C has "entry" as a reserved keyword, so you should not use it for
|
||||
your variable names.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Type promotions
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R used unsigned-preserving rules for arithmetic expresssions, while
|
||||
ISO uses value-preserving. This means an unsigned char compared to an
|
||||
int is done as an unsigned comparison in K+R (since unsigned char
|
||||
promotes to unsigned) while it is signed in ISO (since all of the
|
||||
values in unsigned char fit in an int, it promotes to int).
|
||||
|
||||
Trigraphs
|
||||
---------
|
||||
|
||||
You weren't going to use them anyway, but trigraphs were not defined
|
||||
in K+R C, and some otherwise ISO C compliant compilers do not accept
|
||||
them.
|
||||
You weren't going to use them anyway, but some otherwise ISO C
|
||||
compliant compilers do not accept trigraphs.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Suffixes on Integer Constants
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C did not accept a 'u' suffix on integer constants. If you want
|
||||
to declare a constant to be be unsigned, you must use an explicit
|
||||
cast.
|
||||
|
||||
You should never use a 'l' suffix on integer constants ('L' is fine),
|
||||
since it can easily be confused with the number '1'.
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -300,22 +111,19 @@ long and int are not the same size.
|
|||
Second, if you write a function definition with no return type at
|
||||
all:
|
||||
|
||||
operate (a, b)
|
||||
int a, b;
|
||||
operate (int a, int b)
|
||||
{
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
that function is expected to return int, *not* void. GCC will warn
|
||||
about this. K+R C has no problem with 'void' as a return type, so you
|
||||
need not worry about that.
|
||||
about this.
|
||||
|
||||
Implicit function declarations always have return type int. So if you
|
||||
correct the above definition to
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
operate (a, b)
|
||||
int a, b;
|
||||
operate (int a, int b)
|
||||
...
|
||||
|
||||
but operate() is called above its definition, you will get an error
|
||||
|
|
@ -389,3 +197,205 @@ o Passing incorrect types to fprintf and friends.
|
|||
|
||||
o Adding a function declaration for a module declared in another file to
|
||||
a .c file instead of to a .h file.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
K+R Portability Issues
|
||||
======================
|
||||
|
||||
Unary +
|
||||
-------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C compilers and preprocessors have no notion of unary '+'. Thus
|
||||
the following code snippet contained 2 portability problems.
|
||||
|
||||
int x = +2; /* int x = 2; */
|
||||
#if +1 /* #if 1 */
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Pointers to void
|
||||
----------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C compilers did not have a void pointer, and used char * as the
|
||||
pointer to anything. The macro PTR is defined as either void * or
|
||||
char * depending on whether you have a standards compliant compiler or
|
||||
a K+R one. Thus
|
||||
|
||||
free ((void *) h->value.expansion);
|
||||
|
||||
should have been written
|
||||
|
||||
free ((PTR) h->value.expansion);
|
||||
|
||||
Further, an initial investigation indicates that pointers to functions
|
||||
returning void were okay. Thus the example given by "Calling
|
||||
functions through pointers to functions" below appeared not to cause a
|
||||
problem.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
String literals
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C did not allow concatenation of string literals like
|
||||
|
||||
"This is a " "single string literal".
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
signed keyword
|
||||
--------------
|
||||
|
||||
The signed keyword did not exist in K+R compilers; it was introduced
|
||||
in ISO C89, so you could not use it. In both K+R and standard C,
|
||||
unqualified char and bitfields may be signed or unsigned. There is no
|
||||
way to portably declare signed chars or signed bitfields.
|
||||
|
||||
All other arithmetic types are signed unless you use the 'unsigned'
|
||||
qualifier. For instance, it was safe to write
|
||||
|
||||
short paramc;
|
||||
|
||||
instead of
|
||||
|
||||
signed short paramc;
|
||||
|
||||
If you have an algorithm that depends on signed char or signed
|
||||
bitfields, you had to find another way to write it before it could be
|
||||
integrated into GCC.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Function prototypes
|
||||
-------------------
|
||||
|
||||
You need to provide a function prototype for every function before you
|
||||
use it, and functions had to be defined K+R style. The function
|
||||
prototype should have used the PARAMS macro, which takes a single
|
||||
argument. Therefore the parameter list had to be enclosed in
|
||||
parentheses. For example,
|
||||
|
||||
int myfunc PARAMS ((double, int *));
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
myfunc (var1, var2)
|
||||
double var1;
|
||||
int *var2;
|
||||
{
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
This implies that if the function takes no arguments, it had to be
|
||||
declared and defined as follows:
|
||||
|
||||
int myfunc PARAMS ((void));
|
||||
|
||||
int
|
||||
myfunc ()
|
||||
{
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
You also had to use PARAMS when referring to function protypes in
|
||||
other circumstances, for example see "Calling functions through
|
||||
pointers to functions" below.
|
||||
|
||||
Variable-argument functions are best described by example:-
|
||||
|
||||
void cpp_ice PARAMS ((cpp_reader *, const char *msgid, ...));
|
||||
|
||||
void
|
||||
cpp_ice VPARAMS ((cpp_reader *pfile, const char *msgid, ...))
|
||||
{
|
||||
VA_OPEN (ap, msgid);
|
||||
VA_FIXEDARG (ap, cpp_reader *, pfile);
|
||||
VA_FIXEDARG (ap, const char *, msgid);
|
||||
|
||||
...
|
||||
VA_CLOSE (ap);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
See ansidecl.h for the definitions of the above macros and more.
|
||||
|
||||
One aspect of using K+R style function declarations, is you could not
|
||||
have arguments whose types are char, short, or float, since without
|
||||
prototypes (ie, K+R rules), these types are promoted to int, int, and
|
||||
double respectively.
|
||||
|
||||
Calling functions through pointers to functions
|
||||
-----------------------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C compilers require parentheses around the dereferenced function
|
||||
pointer expression in the call, whereas ISO C relaxes the syntax. For
|
||||
example
|
||||
|
||||
typedef void (* cl_directive_handler) PARAMS ((cpp_reader *, const char *));
|
||||
*p->handler (pfile, p->arg);
|
||||
|
||||
had to become
|
||||
|
||||
(*p->handler) (pfile, p->arg);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Macros
|
||||
------
|
||||
|
||||
The rules under K+R C and ISO C for achieving stringification and
|
||||
token pasting are quite different. Therefore some macros have been
|
||||
defined which will get it right depending upon the compiler.
|
||||
|
||||
CONCAT2(a,b) CONCAT3(a,b,c) and CONCAT4(a,b,c,d)
|
||||
|
||||
will paste the tokens passed as arguments. You must not leave any
|
||||
space around the commas. Also,
|
||||
|
||||
STRINGX(x)
|
||||
|
||||
will stringify an argument; to get the same result on K+R and ISO
|
||||
compilers x should not have spaces around it.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Passing structures by value
|
||||
---------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
You had to avoid passing structures by value, either to or from
|
||||
functions. It seems some K+R compilers handle this differently or not
|
||||
at all.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Enums
|
||||
-----
|
||||
|
||||
In K+R C, you had to cast enum types to use them as integers, and some
|
||||
compilers in particular give lots of warnings for using an enum as an
|
||||
array index.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Bitfields
|
||||
---------
|
||||
|
||||
See also "signed keyword" above. In K+R C only unsigned int bitfields
|
||||
were defined (i.e. unsigned char, unsigned short, unsigned long.
|
||||
Using plain int/short/long was not allowed).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reserved Keywords
|
||||
-----------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C has "entry" as a reserved keyword, so you had to not use it for
|
||||
your variable names.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Type promotions
|
||||
---------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R used unsigned-preserving rules for arithmetic expresssions, while
|
||||
ISO uses value-preserving. This means an unsigned char compared to an
|
||||
int is done as an unsigned comparison in K+R (since unsigned char
|
||||
promotes to unsigned) while it is signed in ISO (since all of the
|
||||
values in unsigned char fit in an int, it promotes to int).
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Suffixes on Integer Constants
|
||||
-----------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
K+R C did not accept a 'u' suffix on integer constants. If you wanted
|
||||
to declare a constant to be be unsigned, you had to use an explicit
|
||||
cast.
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue