mirror of git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
[multiple changes]
2012-04-02 Yannick Moy <moy@adacore.com> * lib-xref-alfa.adb: Code clean up. 2012-04-02 Ed Schonberg <schonberg@adacore.com> * sem_ch12.adb (Analyze_Subprogram_Instantiation): Do not suppress style checks, because the subprogram instance itself may contain violations of syle rules. * style.adb (Missing_Overriding): Check for missing overriding indicator on a subprogram instance. 2012-04-02 Hristian Kirtchev <kirtchev@adacore.com> * sem_ch6.adb (Last_Implicit_Declaration): New routine. (Process_PPCs): Insert the body of _postconditions after the last internally generated declaration. This ensures that actual subtypes created for formal parameters are visible and properly frozen as _postconditions may reference them. From-SVN: r186070
This commit is contained in:
parent
99fc068ee8
commit
e228f7eed2
|
|
@ -1,3 +1,23 @@
|
|||
2012-04-02 Yannick Moy <moy@adacore.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* lib-xref-alfa.adb: Code clean up.
|
||||
|
||||
2012-04-02 Ed Schonberg <schonberg@adacore.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* sem_ch12.adb (Analyze_Subprogram_Instantiation): Do not suppress
|
||||
style checks, because the subprogram instance itself may contain
|
||||
violations of syle rules.
|
||||
* style.adb (Missing_Overriding): Check for missing overriding
|
||||
indicator on a subprogram instance.
|
||||
|
||||
2012-04-02 Hristian Kirtchev <kirtchev@adacore.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* sem_ch6.adb (Last_Implicit_Declaration): New routine.
|
||||
(Process_PPCs): Insert the body of _postconditions after the
|
||||
last internally generated declaration. This ensures that actual
|
||||
subtypes created for formal parameters are visible and properly
|
||||
frozen as _postconditions may reference them.
|
||||
|
||||
2012-04-02 Robert Dewar <dewar@adacore.com>
|
||||
|
||||
* einfo.adb (First_Component_Or_Discriminant) Now applies to
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -570,67 +570,68 @@ package body Alfa is
|
|||
elsif T1.Def /= T2.Def then
|
||||
return T1.Def < T2.Def;
|
||||
|
||||
-- The following should be commented, it sure looks like a test,
|
||||
-- but it sits uncommented between the "third test" and the "fourth
|
||||
-- test! ??? Shouldn't this in any case be an assertion ???
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Ent /= T2.Key.Ent then
|
||||
raise Program_Error;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Fourth test: if reference is in same unit as entity definition,
|
||||
-- sort first.
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Lun /= T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T1.Ent_Scope_File = T1.Key.Lun
|
||||
then
|
||||
return True;
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Lun /= T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T2.Ent_Scope_File = T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
then
|
||||
return False;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Fifth test: if reference is in same unit and same scope as entity
|
||||
-- definition, sort first.
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Ent_Scope_File = T1.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T1.Key.Ref_Scope /= T2.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
and then T1.Key.Ent_Scope = T1.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
then
|
||||
return True;
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T2.Ent_Scope_File = T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T1.Key.Ref_Scope /= T2.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
and then T2.Key.Ent_Scope = T2.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
then
|
||||
return False;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Sixth test: for same entity, sort by reference location unit
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Lun /= T2.Key.Lun then
|
||||
return Dependency_Num (T1.Key.Lun) < Dependency_Num (T2.Key.Lun);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Seventh test: for same entity, sort by reference location scope
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Get_Scope_Num (T1.Key.Ref_Scope) /=
|
||||
Get_Scope_Num (T2.Key.Ref_Scope)
|
||||
then
|
||||
return Get_Scope_Num (T1.Key.Ref_Scope) <
|
||||
Get_Scope_Num (T2.Key.Ref_Scope);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Eighth test: order of location within referencing unit
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Loc /= T2.Key.Loc then
|
||||
return T1.Key.Loc < T2.Key.Loc;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Finally, for two locations at the same address prefer the one that
|
||||
-- does NOT have the type 'r', so that a modification or extension
|
||||
-- takes preference, when there are more than one reference at the
|
||||
-- same location. As a result, in the case of entities that are
|
||||
-- in-out actuals, the read reference follows the modify reference.
|
||||
|
||||
else
|
||||
return T2.Key.Typ = 'r';
|
||||
-- Both entities must be equal at this point
|
||||
|
||||
pragma Assert (T1.Key.Ent = T2.Key.Ent);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Fourth test: if reference is in same unit as entity definition,
|
||||
-- sort first.
|
||||
|
||||
if T1.Key.Lun /= T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T1.Ent_Scope_File = T1.Key.Lun
|
||||
then
|
||||
return True;
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Lun /= T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T2.Ent_Scope_File = T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
then
|
||||
return False;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Fifth test: if reference is in same unit and same scope as
|
||||
-- entity definition, sort first.
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Ent_Scope_File = T1.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T1.Key.Ref_Scope /= T2.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
and then T1.Key.Ent_Scope = T1.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
then
|
||||
return True;
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T2.Ent_Scope_File = T2.Key.Lun
|
||||
and then T1.Key.Ref_Scope /= T2.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
and then T2.Key.Ent_Scope = T2.Key.Ref_Scope
|
||||
then
|
||||
return False;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Sixth test: for same entity, sort by reference location unit
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Lun /= T2.Key.Lun then
|
||||
return Dependency_Num (T1.Key.Lun) <
|
||||
Dependency_Num (T2.Key.Lun);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Seventh test: for same entity, sort by reference location scope
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Get_Scope_Num (T1.Key.Ref_Scope) /=
|
||||
Get_Scope_Num (T2.Key.Ref_Scope)
|
||||
then
|
||||
return Get_Scope_Num (T1.Key.Ref_Scope) <
|
||||
Get_Scope_Num (T2.Key.Ref_Scope);
|
||||
|
||||
-- Eighth test: order of location within referencing unit
|
||||
|
||||
elsif T1.Key.Loc /= T2.Key.Loc then
|
||||
return T1.Key.Loc < T2.Key.Loc;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Finally, for two locations at the same address prefer the one
|
||||
-- that does NOT have the type 'r', so that a modification or
|
||||
-- extension takes preference, when there are more than one
|
||||
-- reference at the same location. As a result, in the case of
|
||||
-- entities that are in-out actuals, the read reference follows
|
||||
-- the modify reference.
|
||||
|
||||
else
|
||||
return T2.Key.Typ = 'r';
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
end Lt;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -4404,9 +4404,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch12 is
|
|||
Parent_Installed : Boolean := False;
|
||||
Renaming_List : List_Id;
|
||||
|
||||
Save_Style_Check : constant Boolean := Style_Check;
|
||||
-- Save style check mode for restore on exit
|
||||
|
||||
procedure Analyze_Instance_And_Renamings;
|
||||
-- The instance must be analyzed in a context that includes the mappings
|
||||
-- of generic parameters into actuals. We create a package declaration
|
||||
|
|
@ -4587,11 +4584,13 @@ package body Sem_Ch12 is
|
|||
|
||||
Instantiation_Node := N;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Turn off style checking in instances. If the check is enabled on the
|
||||
-- generic unit, a warning in an instance would just be noise. If not
|
||||
-- enabled on the generic, then a warning in an instance is just wrong.
|
||||
-- For package instantiations we turn off style checks, because they
|
||||
-- will have been emitted in the generic. For subprogram instantiations
|
||||
-- we want to apply at least the check on overriding indicators so we
|
||||
-- do not modify the style check status.
|
||||
|
||||
Style_Check := False;
|
||||
-- The renaming declarations for the actuals do not come from source and
|
||||
-- will not generate spurious warnings.
|
||||
|
||||
Preanalyze_Actuals (N);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
@ -4859,8 +4858,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch12 is
|
|||
Generic_Renamings_HTable.Reset;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
Style_Check := Save_Style_Check;
|
||||
|
||||
<<Leave>>
|
||||
if Has_Aspects (N) then
|
||||
Analyze_Aspect_Specifications (N, Act_Decl_Id);
|
||||
|
|
@ -4875,8 +4872,6 @@ package body Sem_Ch12 is
|
|||
if Env_Installed then
|
||||
Restore_Env;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
Style_Check := Save_Style_Check;
|
||||
end Analyze_Subprogram_Instantiation;
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -11057,6 +11057,9 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
|
|||
-- that an invariant check is required (for an IN OUT parameter, or
|
||||
-- the returned value of a function.
|
||||
|
||||
function Last_Implicit_Declaration return Node_Id;
|
||||
-- Return the last internally-generated declaration of N
|
||||
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
-- Grab_CC --
|
||||
-------------
|
||||
|
|
@ -11307,6 +11310,50 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
|
|||
end if;
|
||||
end Is_Public_Subprogram_For;
|
||||
|
||||
-------------------------------
|
||||
-- Last_Implicit_Declaration --
|
||||
-------------------------------
|
||||
|
||||
function Last_Implicit_Declaration return Node_Id is
|
||||
Loc : constant Source_Ptr := Sloc (N);
|
||||
Decls : List_Id := Declarations (N);
|
||||
Decl : Node_Id;
|
||||
Succ : Node_Id;
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
if No (Decls) then
|
||||
Decls := New_List (Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
||||
Set_Declarations (N, Decls);
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Is_Empty_List (Declarations (N)) then
|
||||
Append_To (Decls, Make_Null_Statement (Loc));
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Implicit and source declarations may be interspersed. Search for
|
||||
-- the last implicit declaration which is either succeeded by a
|
||||
-- source construct or is the last node in the declarative list.
|
||||
|
||||
Decl := First (Declarations (N));
|
||||
while Present (Decl) loop
|
||||
Succ := Next (Decl);
|
||||
|
||||
-- The current declaration is the last one, do not return Empty
|
||||
|
||||
if No (Succ) then
|
||||
exit;
|
||||
|
||||
-- The successor is a source construct
|
||||
|
||||
elsif Comes_From_Source (Succ) then
|
||||
exit;
|
||||
end if;
|
||||
|
||||
Next (Decl);
|
||||
end loop;
|
||||
|
||||
return Decl;
|
||||
end Last_Implicit_Declaration;
|
||||
|
||||
-- Start of processing for Process_PPCs
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
|
|
@ -11712,7 +11759,7 @@ package body Sem_Ch6 is
|
|||
-- The entity for the _Postconditions procedure
|
||||
|
||||
begin
|
||||
Prepend_To (Declarations (N),
|
||||
Insert_After (Last_Implicit_Declaration,
|
||||
Make_Subprogram_Body (Loc,
|
||||
Specification =>
|
||||
Make_Procedure_Specification (Loc,
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
|
|
@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
|
|||
-- --
|
||||
-- B o d y --
|
||||
-- --
|
||||
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2010, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
||||
-- Copyright (C) 1992-2012, Free Software Foundation, Inc. --
|
||||
-- --
|
||||
-- GNAT is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under --
|
||||
-- terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the Free Soft- --
|
||||
|
|
@ -236,7 +236,13 @@ package body Style is
|
|||
|
||||
procedure Missing_Overriding (N : Node_Id; E : Entity_Id) is
|
||||
begin
|
||||
if Style_Check_Missing_Overriding and then Comes_From_Source (N) then
|
||||
|
||||
-- Perform the check on source subprograms and on subprogram instances,
|
||||
-- because these can be primitives of untagged types.
|
||||
|
||||
if Style_Check_Missing_Overriding
|
||||
and then (Comes_From_Source (N) or else Is_Generic_Instance (E))
|
||||
then
|
||||
if Nkind (N) = N_Subprogram_Body then
|
||||
Error_Msg_NE -- CODEFIX
|
||||
("(style) missing OVERRIDING indicator in body of&", N, E);
|
||||
|
|
|
|||
Loading…
Reference in New Issue