mirror of git://gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git
125 lines
8.6 KiB
HTML
125 lines
8.6 KiB
HTML
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
|
||
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"><html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"><head><meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" /><title>Appendix C. Free Software Needs Free Documentation</title><meta name="generator" content="DocBook XSL Stylesheets Vsnapshot" /><meta name="keywords" content="ISO C++, library" /><meta name="keywords" content="ISO C++, runtime, library" /><link rel="home" href="../index.html" title="The GNU C++ Library" /><link rel="up" href="appendix.html" title="Part IV. Appendices" /><link rel="prev" href="backwards.html" title="Backwards Compatibility" /><link rel="next" href="appendix_gpl.html" title="Appendix D. GNU General Public License version 3" /></head><body><div class="navheader"><table width="100%" summary="Navigation header"><tr><th colspan="3" align="center">Appendix C.
|
||
Free Software Needs Free Documentation
|
||
|
||
</th></tr><tr><td width="20%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="backwards.html">Prev</a> </td><th width="60%" align="center">Part IV.
|
||
Appendices
|
||
</th><td width="20%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="appendix_gpl.html">Next</a></td></tr></table><hr /></div><div class="appendix"><div class="titlepage"><div><div><h1 class="title"><a id="appendix.free"></a>
|
||
Free Software Needs Free Documentation
|
||
<a id="id-1.3.6.4.1.1.1" class="indexterm"></a>
|
||
</h1></div></div></div><p>
|
||
The biggest deficiency in free operating systems is not in the
|
||
software--it is the lack of good free manuals that we can include in
|
||
these systems. Many of our most important programs do not come with
|
||
full manuals. Documentation is an essential part of any software
|
||
package; when an important free software package does not come with a
|
||
free manual, that is a major gap. We have many such gaps today.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Once upon a time, many years ago, I thought I would learn Perl. I got
|
||
a copy of a free manual, but I found it hard to read. When I asked
|
||
Perl users about alternatives, they told me that there were better
|
||
introductory manuals--but those were not free.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Why was this? The authors of the good manuals had written them for
|
||
O'Reilly Associates, which published them with restrictive terms--no
|
||
copying, no modification, source files not available--which exclude
|
||
them from the free software community.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
That wasn't the first time this sort of thing has happened, and (to
|
||
our community's great loss) it was far from the last. Proprietary
|
||
manual publishers have enticed a great many authors to restrict their
|
||
manuals since then. Many times I have heard a GNU user eagerly tell
|
||
me about a manual that he is writing, with which he expects to help
|
||
the GNU project--and then had my hopes dashed, as he proceeded to
|
||
explain that he had signed a contract with a publisher that would
|
||
restrict it so that we cannot use it.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Given that writing good English is a rare skill among programmers, we
|
||
can ill afford to lose manuals this way.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Free documentation, like free software, is a matter of freedom,
|
||
not price. The problem with these manuals was not that O'Reilly
|
||
Associates charged a price for printed copies--that in itself is fine.
|
||
(The Free Software Foundation <a class="link" href="http://www.gnu.org/doc/doc.html" target="_top">sells printed copies</a> of
|
||
free GNU manuals, too.) But GNU manuals are available in source code
|
||
form, while these manuals are available only on paper. GNU manuals
|
||
come with permission to copy and modify; the Perl manuals do not.
|
||
These restrictions are the problems.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
The criterion for a free manual is pretty much the same as for free
|
||
software: it is a matter of giving all users certain freedoms.
|
||
Redistribution (including commercial redistribution) must be
|
||
permitted, so that the manual can accompany every copy of the program,
|
||
on-line or on paper. Permission for modification is crucial too.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
As a general rule, I don't believe that it is essential for people to
|
||
have permission to modify all sorts of articles and books. The issues
|
||
for writings are not necessarily the same as those for software. For
|
||
example, I don't think you or I are obliged to give permission to
|
||
modify articles like this one, which describe our actions and our
|
||
views.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
But there is a particular reason why the freedom to modify is crucial
|
||
for documentation for free software. When people exercise their right
|
||
to modify the software, and add or change its features, if they are
|
||
conscientious they will change the manual too--so they can provide
|
||
accurate and usable documentation with the modified program. A manual
|
||
which forbids programmers to be conscientious and finish the job, or
|
||
more precisely requires them to write a new manual from scratch if
|
||
they change the program, does not fill our community's needs.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
While a blanket prohibition on modification is unacceptable, some
|
||
kinds of limits on the method of modification pose no problem. For
|
||
example, requirements to preserve the original author's copyright
|
||
notice, the distribution terms, or the list of authors, are ok. It is
|
||
also no problem to require modified versions to include notice that
|
||
they were modified, even to have entire sections that may not be
|
||
deleted or changed, as long as these sections deal with nontechnical
|
||
topics. (Some GNU manuals have them.)
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
These kinds of restrictions are not a problem because, as a practical
|
||
matter, they don't stop the conscientious programmer from adapting the
|
||
manual to fit the modified program. In other words, they don't block
|
||
the free software community from making full use of the manual.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
However, it must be possible to modify all the <span class="emphasis"><em>technical</em></span>
|
||
content of the manual, and then distribute the result in all the usual
|
||
media, through all the usual channels; otherwise, the restrictions do
|
||
block the community, the manual is not free, and so we need another
|
||
manual.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Unfortunately, it is often hard to find someone to write another
|
||
manual when a proprietary manual exists. The obstacle is that many
|
||
users think that a proprietary manual is good enough--so they don't
|
||
see the need to write a free manual. They do not see that the free
|
||
operating system has a gap that needs filling.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Why do users think that proprietary manuals are good enough? Some
|
||
have not considered the issue. I hope this article will do something
|
||
to change that.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Other users consider proprietary manuals acceptable for the same
|
||
reason so many people consider proprietary software acceptable: they
|
||
judge in purely practical terms, not using freedom as a criterion.
|
||
These people are entitled to their opinions, but since those opinions
|
||
spring from values which do not include freedom, they are no guide for
|
||
those of us who do value freedom.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
Please spread the word about this issue. We continue to lose manuals
|
||
to proprietary publishing. If we spread the word that proprietary
|
||
manuals are not sufficient, perhaps the next person who wants to help
|
||
GNU by writing documentation will realize, before it is too late, that
|
||
he must above all make it free.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
We can also encourage commercial publishers to sell free, copylefted
|
||
manuals instead of proprietary ones. One way you can help this is to
|
||
check the distribution terms of a manual before you buy it, and
|
||
prefer copylefted manuals to non-copylefted ones.
|
||
</p><p>
|
||
[Note: We now maintain a <a class="link" href="https://www.fsf.org/licensing/doc/other-free-books.html" target="_top">web page
|
||
that lists free books available from other publishers</a>].
|
||
</p><p>Copyright © 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301, USA</p><p>Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article are
|
||
permitted worldwide, without royalty, in any medium, provided this
|
||
notice is preserved.</p><p>Report any problems or suggestions to <code class="email"><<a class="email" href="mailto:webmaster@fsf.org">webmaster@fsf.org</a>></code>.</p></div><div class="navfooter"><hr /><table width="100%" summary="Navigation footer"><tr><td width="40%" align="left"><a accesskey="p" href="backwards.html">Prev</a> </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="u" href="appendix.html">Up</a></td><td width="40%" align="right"> <a accesskey="n" href="appendix_gpl.html">Next</a></td></tr><tr><td width="40%" align="left" valign="top">Backwards Compatibility </td><td width="20%" align="center"><a accesskey="h" href="../index.html">Home</a></td><td width="40%" align="right" valign="top"> Appendix D.
|
||
<acronym class="acronym">GNU</acronym> General Public License version 3
|
||
</td></tr></table></div></body></html> |