selftests/bpf: Migrate from bpf_prog_test_run

bpf_prog_test_run is being deprecated in favor of the OPTS-based
bpf_prog_test_run_opts.
We end up unable to use CHECK in most cases, so replace usages with
ASSERT_* calls.

Signed-off-by: Delyan Kratunov <delyank@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220202235423.1097270-2-delyank@fb.com
This commit is contained in:
Delyan Kratunov
2022-02-02 15:54:20 -08:00
committed by Andrii Nakryiko
parent dd5152ab33
commit 04fcb5f9a1
38 changed files with 648 additions and 522 deletions

View File

@@ -1021,13 +1021,18 @@ static int do_prog_test_run(int fd_prog, bool unpriv, uint32_t expected_val,
{
__u8 tmp[TEST_DATA_LEN << 2];
__u32 size_tmp = sizeof(tmp);
uint32_t retval;
int err, saved_errno;
LIBBPF_OPTS(bpf_test_run_opts, topts,
.data_in = data,
.data_size_in = size_data,
.data_out = tmp,
.data_size_out = size_tmp,
.repeat = 1,
);
if (unpriv)
set_admin(true);
err = bpf_prog_test_run(fd_prog, 1, data, size_data,
tmp, &size_tmp, &retval, NULL);
err = bpf_prog_test_run_opts(fd_prog, &topts);
saved_errno = errno;
if (unpriv)
@@ -1051,9 +1056,8 @@ static int do_prog_test_run(int fd_prog, bool unpriv, uint32_t expected_val,
}
}
if (retval != expected_val &&
expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) {
printf("FAIL retval %d != %d ", retval, expected_val);
if (topts.retval != expected_val && expected_val != POINTER_VALUE) {
printf("FAIL retval %d != %d ", topts.retval, expected_val);
return 1;
}