i40e/i40evf: Only track one ITR setting per ring instead of Tx/Rx

The rings are already split out into Tx and Rx rings so it doesn't make
sense to have any single ring store both a Tx and Rx itr_setting value.
Since that is the case drop the pair in favor of storing just a single ITR
value.

Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Alexander Duyck
2017-12-29 08:49:28 -05:00
committed by Jeff Kirsher
parent 11a350c965
commit 40588ca651
9 changed files with 53 additions and 55 deletions

View File

@@ -315,9 +315,9 @@ static void i40e_dbg_dump_vsi_seid(struct i40e_pf *pf, int seid)
i, rx_ring->vsi,
rx_ring->q_vector);
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
" rx_rings[%i]: rx_itr_setting = %d (%s)\n",
i, rx_ring->rx_itr_setting,
ITR_IS_DYNAMIC(rx_ring->rx_itr_setting) ? "dynamic" : "fixed");
" rx_rings[%i]: itr_setting = %d (%s)\n",
i, rx_ring->itr_setting,
ITR_IS_DYNAMIC(rx_ring->itr_setting) ? "dynamic" : "fixed");
}
for (i = 0; i < vsi->num_queue_pairs; i++) {
struct i40e_ring *tx_ring = READ_ONCE(vsi->tx_rings[i]);
@@ -366,9 +366,9 @@ static void i40e_dbg_dump_vsi_seid(struct i40e_pf *pf, int seid)
" tx_rings[%i]: DCB tc = %d\n",
i, tx_ring->dcb_tc);
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
" tx_rings[%i]: tx_itr_setting = %d (%s)\n",
i, tx_ring->tx_itr_setting,
ITR_IS_DYNAMIC(tx_ring->tx_itr_setting) ? "dynamic" : "fixed");
" tx_rings[%i]: itr_setting = %d (%s)\n",
i, tx_ring->itr_setting,
ITR_IS_DYNAMIC(tx_ring->itr_setting) ? "dynamic" : "fixed");
}
rcu_read_unlock();
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,