i40e: separate PF and VSI state flags

Avoid using the same named flags for both vsi->state and pf->state. This
makes code review easier, as it is more likely that future authors will
use the correct state field when checking bits. Previous commits already
found issues with at least one check, and possibly others may be
incorrect.

This reduces confusion as it is more clear what each flag represents,
and which flags are valid for which state field.

Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Jacob Keller
2017-04-21 13:38:05 -07:00
committed by Jeff Kirsher
parent 2318b4018a
commit d19cb64b92
8 changed files with 64 additions and 55 deletions

View File

@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ static void i40e_dbg_dump_vsi_seid(struct i40e_pf *pf, int seid)
}
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, " active_filters %u, promisc_threshold %u, overflow promisc %s\n",
vsi->active_filters, vsi->promisc_threshold,
(test_bit(__I40E_FILTER_OVERFLOW_PROMISC, &vsi->state) ?
(test_bit(__I40E_VSI_OVERFLOW_PROMISC, &vsi->state) ?
"ON" : "OFF"));
nstat = i40e_get_vsi_stats_struct(vsi);
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev,
@@ -1706,7 +1706,7 @@ static ssize_t i40e_dbg_netdev_ops_write(struct file *filp,
} else if (!vsi->netdev) {
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "tx_timeout: no netdev for VSI %d\n",
vsi_seid);
} else if (test_bit(__I40E_DOWN, &vsi->state)) {
} else if (test_bit(__I40E_VSI_DOWN, &vsi->state)) {
dev_info(&pf->pdev->dev, "tx_timeout: VSI %d not UP\n",
vsi_seid);
} else if (rtnl_trylock()) {