Currently, if find_and_map_user_pages() takes a DMA xfer request from the
user with a length field set to 0, or in a rare case, the host receives
QAIC_TRANS_DMA_XFER_CONT from the device where resources->xferred_dma_size
is equal to the requested transaction size, the function will return 0
before allocating an sgt or setting the fields of the dma_xfer struct.
In that case, encode_addr_size_pairs() will try to access the sgt which
will lead to a general protection fault.
Return an EINVAL in case the user provides a zero-sized ALP, or the device
requests continuation after all of the bytes have been transferred.
Fixes: 96d3c1cade ("accel/qaic: Clean up integer overflow checking in map_user_pages()")
Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <quic_yabdulra@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Youssef Samir <youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Reviewed-by: Carl Vanderlip <carl.vanderlip@oss.qualcomm.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Hugo <jeff.hugo@oss.qualcomm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251007122320.339654-1-youssef.abdulrahman@oss.qualcomm.com
Current wrapper is right-sized to the message being transferred;
however, this is smaller than the structure defining message wrappers
since the trailing element is a union of message/transfer headers of
various sizes (8 and 32 bytes on 32-bit system where issue was
reported). Using the smaller header with a small message
(wire_trans_dma_xfer is 24 bytes including header) ends up being smaller
than a wrapper with the larger header. There are no accesses outside of
the defined size, however they are possible if the larger union member
is referenced.
Abort messages are outside of hot-path and changing the wrapper struct
would require a larger rewrite, so having the memory allocated to the
message be 8 bytes too big is acceptable.
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202310182253.bcb9JcyJ-lkp@intel.com/
Signed-off-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Stanislaw Gruszka <stanislaw.gruszka@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20231027180810.4873-1-quic_jhugo@quicinc.com
The encode_dma() function has some validation on in_trans->size but it
would be more clear to move those checks to find_and_map_user_pages().
The encode_dma() had two checks:
if (in_trans->addr + in_trans->size < in_trans->addr || !in_trans->size)
return -EINVAL;
The in_trans->addr variable is the starting address. The in_trans->size
variable is the total size of the transfer. The transfer can occur in
parts and the resources->xferred_dma_size tracks how many bytes we have
already transferred.
This patch introduces a new variable "remaining" which represents the
amount we want to transfer (in_trans->size) minus the amount we have
already transferred (resources->xferred_dma_size).
I have modified the check for if in_trans->size is zero to instead check
if in_trans->size is less than resources->xferred_dma_size. If we have
already transferred more bytes than in_trans->size then there are negative
bytes remaining which doesn't make sense. If there are zero bytes
remaining to be copied, just return success.
The check in encode_dma() checked that "addr + size" could not overflow
and barring a driver bug that should work, but it's easier to check if
we do this in parts. First check that "in_trans->addr +
resources->xferred_dma_size" is safe. Then check that "xfer_start_addr +
remaining" is safe.
My final concern was that we are dealing with u64 values but on 32bit
systems the kmalloc() function will truncate the sizes to 32 bits. So
I calculated "total = in_trans->size + offset_in_page(xfer_start_addr);"
and returned -EINVAL if it were >= SIZE_MAX. This will not affect 64bit
systems.
Fixes: 129776ac2e ("accel/qaic: Add control path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/24d3348b-25ac-4c1b-b171-9dae7c43e4e0@moroto.mountain
Copy the bounds checking from encode_message() to decode_message().
This patch addresses the following concerns. Ensure that there is
enough space for at least one header so that we don't have a negative
size later.
if (msg_hdr_len < sizeof(*trans_hdr))
Ensure that we have enough space to read the next header from the
msg->data.
if (msg_len > msg_hdr_len - sizeof(*trans_hdr))
return -EINVAL;
Check that the trans_hdr->len is not below the minimum size:
if (hdr_len < sizeof(*trans_hdr))
This minimum check ensures that we don't corrupt memory in
decode_passthrough() when we do.
memcpy(out_trans->data, in_trans->data, len - sizeof(in_trans->hdr));
And finally, use size_add() to prevent an integer overflow:
if (size_add(msg_len, hdr_len) > msg_hdr_len)
Fixes: 129776ac2e ("accel/qaic: Add control path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4.x
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/ZK0Q5nbLyDO7kJa+@moroto
There are several issues in this code. The check at the start of the
loop:
if (user_len >= user_msg->len) {
This check does not ensure that we have enough space for the trans_hdr
(8 bytes). Instead the check needs to be:
if (user_len > user_msg->len - sizeof(*trans_hdr)) {
That subtraction is done as an unsigned long we want to avoid
negatives. Add a lower bound to the start of the function.
if (user_msg->len < sizeof(*trans_hdr))
There is a second integer underflow which can happen if
trans_hdr->len is zero inside the encode_passthrough() function.
memcpy(out_trans->data, in_trans->data, in_trans->hdr.len - sizeof(in_trans->hdr));
Instead of adding a check to encode_passthrough() it's better to check
in this central place. Add that check:
if (trans_hdr->len < sizeof(trans_hdr)
The final concern is that the "user_len + trans_hdr->len" might have an
integer overflow bug. Use size_add() to prevent that.
- if (user_len + trans_hdr->len > user_msg->len) {
+ if (size_add(user_len, trans_hdr->len) > user_msg->len) {
Fixes: 129776ac2e ("accel/qaic: Add control path")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@linaro.org>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 6.4.x
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/9a0cb0c1-a974-4f10-bc8d-94437983639a@moroto.mountain
If msg_xfer() is unable to queue part of a NNC message because the MHI ring
is full, it will attempt to give the QSM some time to drain the queue.
However, if QSM fails to make any room, msg_xfer() will fail and tell the
caller to try again. This is problematic because part of the message may
have been committed to the ring and there is no mechanism to revoke that
content. This will cause QSM to receive a corrupt message.
The better way to do this is to check if the ring has enough space for the
entire message before committing any of the message. Since msg_xfer() is
under the cntl_mutex no one else can come in and consume the space.
Fixes: 129776ac2e ("accel/qaic: Add control path")
Signed-off-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Pranjal Ramajor Asha Kanojiya <quic_pkanojiy@quicinc.com>
Reviewed-by: Carl Vanderlip <quic_carlv@quicinc.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20230517193540.14323-6-quic_jhugo@quicinc.com
