This test verifies driver behavior with regards to creation of RIFs for a
bridge as LAGs are added or removed to/from it, and ports added or removed
to/from the LAG.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This test verifies driver behavior with regards to creation of RIFs for LAG
VLAN uppers as ports are added or removed to/from the LAG.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This test verifies driver behavior with regards to creation of RIFs for a
LAG as ports are added or removed to/from it.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Support for enslaving ports to LAGs with uppers will be added in the
following patches. Selftests to make sure it actually does the right thing
are ready and will be sent as a follow-up.
Similarly, ordering of MACVLAN creation and RIF creation will be relaxed
and it will be permitted to create a MACVLAN first.
Thus these two tests are obsolete. Drop them.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge, the bridge
MAC address does not have the same prefix as other interfaces in the
system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all the RIFs have to have the same
38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge does not obey this limitation,
the RIF cannot be created, and the enslavement attempt is vetoed on the
grounds of the configuration not being offloadable.
The bridge eventually inherits MAC address from its first member, after the
enslavement is acked. A number of (mainly VXLAN) selftests already work
around the problem by setting the MAC address to whatever it will
eventually be anyway. Do the same for this selftest.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge (this holds
for all bridges used here), the bridge MAC address does not have the same
prefix as other interfaces in the system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all
the RIFs have to have the same 38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge
does not obey this limitation, the RIF cannot be created, and the
enslavement attempt is vetoed on the grounds of the configuration not being
offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks various aspects of VXLAN offloading and
the bridges do not need to participate in routing traffic. The IP addresses
or the RIFs are irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridges in this selftest, thus exempting them from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge, the bridge
MAC address does not have the same prefix as other interfaces in the
system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all the RIFs have to have the same
38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge does not obey this limitation,
the RIF cannot be created, and the enslavement attempt is vetoed on the
grounds of the configuration not being offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks vetoing of a different aspect of the
configuration and the bridge does not need to participate in routing
traffic. The IP address or the RIF are irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridge in this selftest, thus exempting it from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge (this holds
for both bridges used here), the bridge MAC address does not have the same
prefix as other interfaces in the system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all
the RIFs have to have the same 38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge
does not obey this limitation, the RIF cannot be created, and the
enslavement attempt is vetoed on the grounds of the configuration not being
offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks traffic prioritization and scheduling,
and the bridges serve for their L2 forwarding capabilities, and do not need
to participate in routing traffic. The IP addresses or the RIFs are
irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridges in this selftest, thus exempting them from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge (this holds
for both bridges used here), the bridge MAC address does not have the same
prefix as other interfaces in the system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all
the RIFs have to have the same 38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge
does not obey this limitation, the RIF cannot be created, and the
enslavement attempt is vetoed on the grounds of the configuration not being
offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks traffic prioritization and scheduling,
and the bridges serve for their L2 forwarding capabilities, and do not need
to participate in routing traffic. The IP addresses or the RIFs are
irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridges in this selftest, thus exempting them from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge, the bridge
MAC address does not have the same prefix as other interfaces in the
system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all the RIFs have to have the same
38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge does not obey this limitation,
the RIF cannot be created, and the enslavement attempt is vetoed on the
grounds of the configuration not being offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks DCB DSCP-based prioritization, and the
bridge serves for its L2 forwarding capabilities, and does not need to
participate in routing traffic. The IP address or the RIF are irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridge in this selftest, thus exempting it from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge, the bridge
MAC address does not have the same prefix as other interfaces in the
system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all the RIFs have to have the same
38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge does not obey this limitation,
the RIF cannot be created, and the enslavement attempt is vetoed on the
grounds of the configuration not being offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks how many mirroring sessions a machine is
capable of offloading. The IP address or the RIF are irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridge in this selftest, thus exempting it from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
At the time that the front panel port is enslaved to the bridge (this holds
for all bridges used here), the bridge MAC address does not have the same
prefix as other interfaces in the system. On Nvidia Spectrum-1 machines all
the RIFs have to have the same 38-bit MAC address prefix. Since the bridge
does not obey this limitation, the RIF cannot be created, and the
enslavement attempt is vetoed on the grounds of the configuration not being
offloadable.
The selftest itself however checks whether a different vetoed aspect of the
configuration provides an extack. The IP address or the RIF are irrelevant.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the HW-offloaded
bridges in this selftest, thus exempting them from mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
In a future patch, mlxsw will start adding RIFs to uppers of front panel
port netdevices, if they have an IP address.
The swp enslavement to the 802.1ad bridge is not allowed, because RIFs are
not allowed to be created for 802.1ad bridges, but the address indicates
one needs to be created. Thus the veto selftests fail already during the
port enslavement. Then the attempt to create a VLAN on top of the same
bridge is not vetoed, because the bridge is not related to mlxsw, and the
selftest fails.
Fix by disabling automatic IPv6 address generation for the bridges in this
selftest, thus exempting them from the mlxsw router attention.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The topology diagram implies that $swp1 and $swp2 are members of the bridge
br0, when in fact only their uppers, $swp1.10 and $swp2.10 are. Adjust the
diagram.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The topology diagram implies that $swp1 and $swp2 are members of the bridge
br0, when in fact only their uppers, $swp1.10 and $swp2.10 are. Adjust the
diagram.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
mlxsw selftests often invoke a bail_on_lldpad() helper to make sure LLDPAD
is not running, to prevent conflicts between the QoS configuration applied
through TC or DCB command line tool, and the DCB configuration that LLDPAD
might apply. This helper might be useful to others. Move the function to
lib.sh, and parameterize to make reusable in other contexts.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The driver-specific wrappers of these selftests invoke bail_on_lldpad to
make sure that LLDPAD doesn't trample the configuration. The function
bail_on_lldpad is going to move to lib.sh in the next patch. With that, it
won't be visible for the wrappers before sourcing the framework script. And
after sourcing it, it is too late: the selftest will have run by then.
One option might be to source NUM_NETIFS=0 lib.sh from the wrapper, but
even if that worked (it might, it might not), that seems cumbersome. lib.sh
is doing fair amount of stuff, and even if it works today, it does not look
particularly solid as a solution.
Instead, introduce a hook, sch_tbf_pre_hook(), that when available, gets
invoked. Move the bail to the hook.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Set up default port priority through the iproute2 dcb tool, which is easier
to understand and manage.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Set up DSCP prioritization through the iproute2 dcb tool, which is easier
to understand and manage.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Set up DSCP prioritization through the iproute2 dcb tool, which is easier
to understand and manage.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Danielle Ratson <danieller@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Now that Spectrum-1 gained ip6gre support we can move the test out of
the Spectrum-2 directory.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Test that packets received via a locked bridge port whose {SMAC, VID}
does not appear in the bridge's FDB or appears with a different port,
trigger the "locked_port" packet trap.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <vladimir.oltean@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
The previous patch added a test which can be used instead of qos_burst.sh.
Remove this test.
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Add an equivalent test to qos_burst, the test's purpose is same, but the
new test uses simpler topology and does not require forcing low speed.
In addition, it can be run Spectrum-2 and not only Spectrum-3+. The idea
is to use a shaper in order to limit the traffic and create congestion.
qos_burst test uses small pool, sends many small packets, and verify that
packets are not dropped, which means that many descriptors can be handled.
This test should check the change that commit c864769add
("mlxsw: Configure descriptor buffers") pushed.
Instead, the new test tries to use more than 85% of maximum supported
descriptors. The idea is to use big pool (as much as the ASIC supports),
such that the pool size does not limit the traffic, then send many small
packets, which means that many descriptors are used, and check how many
packets the switch can handle.
The usage of shaper allows to run the test in all ASICs, regardless of
the CPU abilities, as it is able to create the congestion with low rate
of packets.
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
QOS tests create congestion and verify the switch behavior. To create
congestion, they need to have more traffic than the port can handle, so
some of them force 1Gbps speed.
The tests assume that 1Gbps speed is supported, otherwise, they will fail.
Spectrum-4 ASIC will not support this speed in all ports, so to be able
to run the tests there, some adjustments are required. Use shapers to limit
the traffic instead of forcing speed. Note that for several ports, the
speed configuration is just for autoneg issues, so shaper is not needed
instead.
The tests already use ETS qdisc as a root and RED qdiscs as children. Add
a new TBF shaper to limit the rate of traffic, and use it as a root qdisc,
then save the previous hierarchy of qdiscs under the new TBF root.
In some ASICs, the shapers do not limit the traffic as accurately as
forcing speed. To make the tests stable, allow the backlog size to be up to
+-10% of the threshold. The aim of the tests is to make sure that with
backlog << threshold, there are no drops, and that packets are dropped
somewhere in vicinity of the configured threshold.
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
QOS tests create congestion and verify the switch behavior. To create
congestion, they need to have more traffic than the port can handle, so
some of them force 1Gbps speed.
The tests assume that 1Gbps speed is supported, otherwise, they will fail.
Spectrum-4 ASIC will not support this speed in all ports, so to be able
to run QOS tests there, some adjustments are required. Use shapers to
limit the traffic instead of forcing speed. Note that for several ports,
the speed configuration is just for autoneg issues, so shaper is not needed
instead.
In tests that already use shapers, set the existing shaper to be a child of
a new TBF shaper which is added as a root qdisc and acts as a port shaper.
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
After routing, the device always consults a table that determines the
packet's egress VID based on {egress RIF, egress local port}. In the
unified bridge model, it is up to software to maintain this table via
REIV register.
The table needs to be updated in the following flows:
1. When a RIF is set on a FID, for each FID's {Port, VID} mapping, a new
{RIF, Port}->VID mapping should be created.
2. When a {Port, VID} is mapped to a FID and the FID already has a RIF,
a new {RIF, Port}->VID mapping should be created.
Add a test to verify that packets get the correct VID after routing,
regardless of the order of the configuration.
# ./egress_vid_classification.sh
TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping [ OK ]
TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ]
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.
For VXLAN decapsulation, the FID classification is done according to the
VNI. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, the existing VNI->FID mapping
should be updated by the software with the new RIF. In addition, when a new
mapping is added for FID which already has a RIF, the correct RIF should
be used for it.
Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after decapsulation which
is done after VNI->FID classification, regardless of the order of the
configuration.
# ./ingress_rif_conf_vxlan.sh
TEST: Add RIF for existing VNI->FID mapping [ OK ]
TEST: Add VNI->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ]
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.
For VLAN-aware bridges (802.1Q), the FID classification is done according
to VID. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, the existing VID->FID mapping
should be updated by the software with the new RIF.
We never map multiple VLANs to the same FID using VID->FID, so we cannot
create VID->FID for FID which already has a RIF using 802.1Q. Anyway,
verify that packets can be routed via port which is added after the FID
already has a RIF.
Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after VID->FID
classification, regardless of the order of the configuration.
# ./ingress_rif_conf_1q.sh
TEST: Add RIF for existing VID->FID mapping [ OK ]
TEST: Add port to VID->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ]
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Before layer 2 forwarding, the device classifies an incoming packet to a
FID. After classification, the FID is known, but also all the attributes of
the FID, such as the router interface (RIF) via which a packet that needs
to be routed will ingress the router block.
For VLAN-unaware bridges (802.1D), the FID classification is done according
to {Port, VID}. When a RIF is added on top of a FID, all the existing
{Port, VID}->FID mappings should be updated by the software with the new
RIF. In addition, when a new mapping is added for FID which already has a
RIF, the correct RIF should be used for it.
Add a test to verify that packets can be routed after {Port, VID}->FID
classification, regardless of the order of the configuration.
# ./ingress_rif_conf_1d.sh
TEST: Add RIF for existing {port, VID}->FID mapping [ OK ]
TEST: Add {port, VID}->FID mapping for FID with a RIF [ OK ]
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Once line card is activated, check the FW version and PSID are exposed.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Once line card is provisioned, check if HW revision and INI version
are exposed on associated nested auxiliary device.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Instead of hard coding the scale target in the test, dynamically set it
based on the maximum number of flow counters and their current
occupancy.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This tests creates as many RIFs as possible, ideally more than there can be
RIF counters (though that is currently only possible on Spectrum-1). It
then tries to enable L3 HW stats on each of the RIFs. It also contains the
traffic test, which tries to run traffic through a log2 of those counters
and checks that the traffic is shown in the counter values.
Like with tc_flower traffic test, take a log2 subset of rules. The logic
behind picking log2 rules is that then every bit of the instantiated item's
number is exercised. This should catch issues whether they happen at the
high end, low end, or somewhere in between.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add a test that checks that the created filters do actually trigger on
matching traffic.
Exercising all the rules would be a very lengthy process. Instead, take a
log2 subset of rules. The logic behind picking log2 rules is that then
every bit of the instantiated item's number is exercised. This should catch
issues whether they happen at the high end, low end, or somewhere in
between.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The scale tests are verifying behavior of mlxsw when number of instances of
some resource reaches the ASIC capacity. The number of instances is
referred to as "target" number.
No scale tests so far needed to know this target number to clean up. E.g.
the tc_flower simply removes the clsact qdisc that all the tested filters
are hooked onto, and that takes care of collecting all the filters.
However, for the RIF counter test, which is being added in a future patch,
VLAN netdevices are created. These are created as part of the test, but of
course the cleanup needs to undo them again. For that it needs to know how
many there were. To support this usage, pass the target number to the
cleanup callback.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The scale tests are currently testing two things: that some number of
instances of a given resource can actually be created; and that when an
attempt is made to create more than the supported amount, the failures are
noted and handled gracefully.
Sometimes the scale test depends on more than one resource. In particular,
a following patch will add a RIF counter scale test, which depends on the
number of RIF counters that can be bound, and also on the number of RIFs
that can be created.
When the test is limited by the auxiliary resource and not by the primary
one, there's no point trying to run the overflow test, because it would be
testing exhaustion of the wrong resource.
To support this use case, when the $test_get_target yields 0, skip the test
instead.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The scale tests are currently testing two things: that some number of
instances of a given resource can actually be created; and that when an
attempt is made to create more than the supported amount, the failures are
noted and handled gracefully.
However the ability to allocate the resource does not mean that the
resource actually works when passing traffic. For that, make it possible
for a given scale to also test traffic.
Traffic test is only run on the positive leg of the scale test (no point
trying to pass traffic when the expected outcome is that the resource will
not be allocated). Traffic tests are opt-in, if a given test does not
expose it, it is not run.
To this end, delay the test cleanup until after the traffic test is run.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The scale of each resource is tested in the following manner:
1. The scale target is queried.
2. The test setup is prepared.
3. The test is invoked.
In some cases, the occupancy of a resource changes as part of the second
step, requiring the test to return a scale target that takes this change
into account.
Make this more robust by re-querying the scale target after the second
step.
Another possible solution is to swap the first and second steps, but
when a test needs to be skipped (i.e., scale target is zero), the setup
would have been in vain.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
A number of mlxsw-specific QoS tests use manual QoS DCB management. As
such, they need to make sure lldpad is not running, because it would
override the configuration the test has applied using other tools. To that
end, these selftests invoke the bail_on_lldpad() helper, which terminates
the selftest if th lldpad is running.
Some of these tests however first install the bash exit trap, which invokes
a cleanup() at the test exit. If bail_on_lldpad() has terminated the script
even before the setup part was run, the cleanup part will be very confused.
Therefore make sure bail_on_lldpad() is invoked before the cleanup is
registered.
While there are still edge cases where the user terminates the script
before the setup was fully done, this takes care of a common situation
where the cleanup would be invoked in an inconsistent state.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Add a test that sends 1Gbps of traffic through the switch, into which it
then injects a burst of traffic and tests that there are no drops.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Once line card is activated, check the device FW version is exposed.
Signed-off-by: Jiri Pirko <jiri@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
