`config.{arch}` had entries already present in `config`.
When generating the config used by vmtest, concatenate the `config` file
with the `config.{arch}` one, making those entries duplicated, so remove
those duplications.
Use the following command to get the differences:
$ comm -1 -2 <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.x86_64) <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config)
$ comm -1 -2 <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.aarch64) <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config)
$ comm -1 -2 <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.riscv64) <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config)
$ comm -1 -2 <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.ppc64el) <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config)
$ comm -1 -2 <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config.s390x) <(sort tools/testing/selftests/bpf/config)
This is similar with commit 7a42af4b94 ("selftests/bpf: Remove entries
from config.s390x already present in config").
Signed-off-by: Tiezhu Yang <yangtiezhu@loongson.cn>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20250826065057.11415-1-yangtiezhu@loongson.cn
This code is rarely (never?) enabled by distros, and it hasn't caught
anything in decades. Let's kill off this legacy debug code.
Suggested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Those configs are needed to be able to run VM somewhat consistently.
For instance, ATM, s390x is missing the `CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE` which
prevents s390x kernels built in CI to leverage qemu-guest-agent.
By moving them to `config,vm`, we should have selftest kernels which are
equal in term of VM functionalities when they include this file.
The set of config unabled were picked using
grep -h -E '(_9P|_VIRTIO)' config.x86_64 config | sort | uniq
added to `config.vm` and then
grep -vE '(_9P|_VIRTIO)' config.{x86_64,aarch64,s390x}
as a side-effect, some config may have disappeared to the aarch64 and
s390x kernels, but they should not be needed. CI will tell.
Signed-off-by: Manu Bretelle <chantr4@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20231031212717.4037892-1-chantr4@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
When running tests, we should probably accept any help we can get when
it comes to detecting issues early or making them more debuggable. We
have seen a few cases where a test_progs_noalu32 run, for example,
encountered a soft lockup and stopped making progress. It was only
interrupted once we hit the overall test timeout [0]. We can not and do
not want to necessarily rely on test timeouts, because those rely on
infrastructure provided by the environment we run in (and which is not
present in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/vmtest.sh, for example).
To that end, let's enable panics on soft as well as hard lockups to fail
fast should we encounter one. That's happening in the configuration
indented to be used for selftests (including when using vmtest.sh or
when running in BPF CI).
[0] https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/runs/7844499997
Signed-off-by: Daniel Müller <deso@posteo.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221025231546.811766-1-deso@posteo.net
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Perform several tests to ensure the correct implementation of the
bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature() kfunc.
Do the tests with data signed with a generated testing key (by using
sign-file from scripts/) and with the tcp_bic.ko kernel module if it is
found in the system. The test does not fail if tcp_bic.ko is not found.
First, perform an unsuccessful signature verification without data.
Second, perform a successful signature verification with the session
keyring and a new one created for testing.
Then, ensure that permission and validation checks are done properly on the
keyring provided to bpf_verify_pkcs7_signature(), despite those checks were
deferred at the time the keyring was retrieved with bpf_lookup_user_key().
The tests expect to encounter an error if the Search permission is removed
from the keyring, or the keyring is expired.
Finally, perform a successful and unsuccessful signature verification with
the keyrings with pre-determined IDs (the last test fails because the key
is not in the platform keyring).
The test is currently in the deny list for s390x (JIT does not support
calling kernel function).
Signed-off-by: Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220920075951.929132-13-roberto.sassu@huaweicloud.com
Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
