The current tests use the prctls for various things but there's no
coverage of the edges of the interface so add some basics. This isn't
hugely useful as it is (it originally had some coverage for the
combinations with asymmetric mode but we removed the prctl() for that)
but it might be a helpful starting point for future work, for example
covering error handling.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220419103243.24774-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
The MTE selftests have a helper evaluate_test() which translates a return
code into a call to ksft_test_result_*(). Currently this only handles pass
and fail, silently ignoring any other code. Update the helper to support
skipped tests and log any unknown return codes as an error so we get at
least some diagnostic if anything goes wrong.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220419103243.24774-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently we validate that we can set the floating point state via the SVE
regset and read the data via the FPSIMD regset but we do not valiate that
the opposite case works as expected. Add a test that covers this case,
noting that when reading via SVE regset the kernel has the option of
returning either SVE or FPSIMD data so we need to accept both formats.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404090613.181272-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently the sve-ptrace test for setting and reading FPSIMD data assumes
that the child will start off in FPSIMD only mode and that it can use this
to read some FPSIMD mode SVE ptrace data, skipping the test if it can't.
This isn't an assumption guaranteed by the ABI and also limits how we can
use this testcase within the program. Instead skip the initial read and
just generate a FPSIMD format buffer for the write part of the test, making
the coverage more robust in the face of future kernel and test program
changes.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220404090613.181272-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
If the test triggers a problem it may well result in a log message from
the kernel such as a WARN() or BUG(). If these include a PID it can help
with debugging to know if it was the parent or child process that triggered
the issue, since the test is just creating a new thread the process name
will be the same either way. Print the PIDs of the parent and child on
startup so users have this information to hand should it be needed.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220303192817.2732509-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
The GCR EL1 test unconditionally includes local definitions of the prctls
it tests. Since not only will the kselftest build infrastructure ensure
that the in tree uapi headers are available but the toolchain being used to
build kselftest may ensure that system uapi headers with MTE support are
available this causes the compiler to warn about duplicate definitions.
Remove these duplicate definitions.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Acked-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220126174421.1712795-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Currently we unconditionally test the ability to set the vector length
inheritance flag via ptrace meaning that we generate false failures on
systems that don't support SVE when we attempt to set the vector length
there. Check the hwcap and mark the tests as skipped when it's not present.
Fixes: 0ba1ce1e86 ("selftests: arm64: Add coverage of ptrace flags for SVE VL inheritance")
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220124175527.3260234-2-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Since it's likely to be useful for performance work with SVE let's have a
pidbench that gives us some numbers for consideration. In order to ensure
that we test exactly the scenario we want this is written in assembly - if
system libraries use SVE this would stop us exercising the case where the
process has never used SVE.
We exercise three cases:
- Never having used SVE.
- Having used SVE once.
- Using SVE after each syscall.
by spinning running getpid() for a fixed number of iterations with the
time measured using CNTVCT_EL0 reported on the console. This is obviously
a totally unrealistic benchmark which will show the extremes of any
performance variation but equally given the potential gotchas with use of
FP instructions by system libraries it's good to have some concrete code
shared to make it easier to compare notes on results.
Testing over multiple SVE vector lengths will need to be done with vlset
currently, the test could be extended to iterate over all of them if
desired.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211202165107.1075259-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently we don't have any coverage of the syscall ABI so let's add a very
dumb test program which sets up register patterns, does a sysscall and then
checks that the register state after the syscall matches what we expect.
The program is written in an extremely simplistic fashion with the goal of
making it easy to verify that it's doing what it thinks it's doing, it is
not a model of how one should write actual code.
Currently we validate the general purpose, FPSIMD and SVE registers. There
are other thing things that could be covered like FPCR and flags registers,
these can be covered incrementally - my main focus at the minute is
covering the ABI for the SVE registers.
The program repeats the tests for all possible SVE vector lengths in case
some vector length specific optimisation causes issues, as well as testing
FPSIMD only. It tries two syscalls, getpid() and sched_yield(), in an
effort to cover both immediate return to userspace and scheduling another
task though there are no guarantees which cases will be hit.
A new test directory "abi" is added to hold the test, it doesn't seem to
fit well into any of the existing directories.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210184133.320748-7-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Currently we have the facility to specify custom code to trigger a signal
but none of the tests use it and for some reason the framework requires us
to also specify a signal to send as a trigger in order to make use of a
custom trigger. This doesn't seem to make much sense, instead allow the
use of a custom trigger function without specifying a signal to inject.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210184133.320748-6-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
SME introduces a new mode called streaming mode in which the SVE registers
have a different vector length. Since the ptrace interface for this is
based on the existing SVE interface prepare for supporting this by moving
the regset specific configuration into struct and passing that around,
allowing these tests to be reused for streaming mode. As we will also have
to verify the interoperation of the SVE and streaming SVE regsets don't
just iterate over an array.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211210184133.320748-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
ARRAY_SIZE is defined in several selftests. Remove definitions from
individual test files and include header file for the define instead.
ARRAY_SIZE define is added in a separate patch to prepare for this
change.
Remove ARRAY_SIZE from vec-syscfg.c and pickup the one defined in
kselftest.h.
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
The various floating point test programs written in assembly have a bunch
of helper functions and macros which are cut'n'pasted between them. Factor
them out into a separate source file which is linked into all of them.
We don't include memcmp() since it isn't as generic as it should be and
directly branches to report an error in the programs.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20211019181851.3341232-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
As part of the enumeration interface for setting vector lengths it is valid
to set vector lengths not supported in the system, these will be rounded to
a supported vector length and returned from the prctl(). Add a test which
exercises this for every valid vector length and makes sure that the return
value is as expected and that this is reflected in the actual system state.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Tomohiro Misono <misono.tomohiro@jp.fujitsu.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-5-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
We had some test code for verifying that we can write the current VL via
the prctl() interface but the condition for the test was inverted which
wasn't noticed as it was never actually hooked up to the array of tests
we execute. Fix this.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210929151925.9601-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Currently the selftest for the SVE register set is not quite as thorough
as is desirable - it only validates that the value of a single Z register
is not modified by a partial write to a lower numbered Z register after
having previously been set through the FPSIMD regset.
Make this more thorough:
- Test the ability to set vector lengths and enumerate those supported in
the system.
- Validate data in all Z and P registers, plus FPSR and FPCR.
- Test reads via the FPSIMD regset after set via the SVE regset.
There's still some oversights, the main one being that due to the need to
generate a pattern in FFR and the fact that this rewrite is primarily
motivated by SME's streaming SVE which doesn't have FFR we don't currently
test FFR. Update the TODO to reflect those that occurred to me (and fix an
adjacent typo in there).
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-8-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
When verifying setting a Z register via ptrace we check each byte by hand,
iterating over the buffer using a pointer called p and treating each
register value written as a test. This creates output referring to "p[X]"
which is confusing since SVE also has predicate registers Pn. Tweak the
output to avoid confusion here.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-6-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
For some reason the SVE ptrace test code starts off by setting values in
some of the SVE vector registers in the parent process which it then never
interacts with when verifying the ptrace interfaces. This is not especially
relevant to what's being tested and somewhat confusing when reading the
code so let's remove it.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913125505.52619-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
During initialization of a signal testcase, features declared as required
are properly checked against the running system but no action is then taken
to effectively skip such a testcase.
Fix core signals test logic to abort initialization and report such a
testcase as skipped to the KSelfTest framework.
Fixes: f96bf43403 ("kselftest: arm64: mangle_pstate_invalid_compat_toggle and common utils")
Signed-off-by: Cristian Marussi <cristian.marussi@arm.com>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210920121228.35368-1-cristian.marussi@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
A signal frame with SVE may validly either be a bare struct sve_context or
a struct sve_context followed by vector length dependent register data.
Support either in the generic helpers for the signal tests, and while we're
at it validate the SVE vector length reported.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819134245.13935-3-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
When skipping the tests due to a lack of system support for MTE we
currently print a message saying FAIL which makes it look like the test
failed even though the test did actually report KSFT_SKIP, creating some
confusion. Change the error message to say SKIP instead so things are
clearer.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210819172902.56211-1-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
We provide interfaces for configuring the SVE vector length seen by
processes using prctl and also via /proc for configuring the default
values. Provide tests that exercise all these interfaces and verify that
they take effect as expected, though at present no test fully enumerates
all the possible vector lengths.
A subset of this is already tested via sve-probe-vls but the /proc
interfaces are not currently covered at all.
In preparation for the forthcoming support for SME, the Scalable Matrix
Extension, which has separately but similarly configured vector lengths
which we expect to offer similar userspace interfaces for, all the actual
files and prctls used are parameterised and we don't validate that the
architectural minimum vector length is the minimum we see.
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210803140450.46624-4-broonie@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
