The ageing time used by the test is too short for debug kernels and
results in entries being aged out prematurely [1].
Fix by increasing the ageing time.
[1]
# ./vxlan_bridge_1q.sh
[...]
INFO: learning vlan 10
TEST: VXLAN: flood before learning [ OK ]
TEST: VXLAN: show learned FDB entry [ OK ]
TEST: VXLAN: learned FDB entry [FAIL]
swp4: Expected to capture 0 packets, got 10.
RTNETLINK answers: No such file or directory
TEST: VXLAN: deletion of learned FDB entry [ OK ]
TEST: VXLAN: Ageing of learned FDB entry [FAIL]
swp4: Expected to capture 0 packets, got 10.
TEST: VXLAN: learning toggling on bridge port [ OK ]
[...]
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@nvidia.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240304095612.462900-5-idosch@nvidia.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Remove `vxlan_ping_test()` which is not used and probably was copied
mistakenly from vxlan_bridge_1d.sh.
This was found while adding an equivalent test for IPv6.
Signed-off-by: Amit Cohen <amcohen@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@nvidia.com>
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
When using VLAN-aware bridges with VXLAN, the VLAN that is mapped to the
VNI of the VXLAN device is that which is configured as "pvid untagged"
on the corresponding bridge port.
When these flags are toggled or when the VLAN is deleted entirely,
remote hosts should not be able to receive packets from the VTEP.
Add a test case for above mentioned scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
The test is very similar to its VLAN-unaware counterpart
(vxlan_bridge_1d.sh), but instead of using multiple VLAN-unaware
bridges, a single VLAN-aware bridge is used with multiple VLANs.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@mellanox.com>
Reviewed-by: Petr Machata <petrm@mellanox.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
