Commit 04b01625 authored by Peter Zijlstra's avatar Peter Zijlstra
Browse files

perf/uprobe: split uprobe_unregister()



With uprobe_unregister() having grown a synchronize_srcu(), it becomes
fairly slow to call. Esp. since both users of this API call it in a
loop.

Peel off the sync_srcu() and do it once, after the loop.

We also need to add uprobe_unregister_sync() into uprobe_register()'s
error handling path, as we need to be careful about returning to the
caller before we have a guarantee that partially attached consumer won't
be called anymore. This is an unlikely slow path and this should be
totally fine to be slow in the case of a failed attach.

Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatar"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>
Co-developed-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarPeter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Reviewed-by: default avatarOleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240903174603.3554182-6-andrii@kernel.org
parent cc01bd04
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+6 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ extern unsigned long uprobe_get_trap_addr(struct pt_regs *regs);
extern int uprobe_write_opcode(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct mm_struct *mm, unsigned long vaddr, uprobe_opcode_t);
extern struct uprobe *uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, loff_t ref_ctr_offset, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
extern int uprobe_apply(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool);
extern void uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
extern void uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc);
extern void uprobe_unregister_sync(void);
extern int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma);
extern void uprobe_munmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long start, unsigned long end);
extern void uprobe_start_dup_mmap(void);
@@ -164,7 +165,10 @@ uprobe_apply(struct uprobe* uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc, bool add)
	return -ENOSYS;
}
static inline void
uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
}
static inline void uprobe_unregister_sync(void)
{
}
static inline int uprobe_mmap(struct vm_area_struct *vma)
+15 −6
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1105,11 +1105,11 @@ register_for_each_vma(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *new)
}

/**
 * uprobe_unregister - unregister an already registered probe.
 * uprobe_unregister_nosync - unregister an already registered probe.
 * @uprobe: uprobe to remove
 * @uc: identify which probe if multiple probes are colocated.
 */
void uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
void uprobe_unregister_nosync(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
{
	int err;

@@ -1121,12 +1121,15 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
	/* TODO : cant unregister? schedule a worker thread */
	if (unlikely(err)) {
		uprobe_warn(current, "unregister, leaking uprobe");
		goto out_sync;
		return;
	}

	put_uprobe(uprobe);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister_nosync);

out_sync:
void uprobe_unregister_sync(void)
{
	/*
	 * Now that handler_chain() and handle_uretprobe_chain() iterate over
	 * uprobe->consumers list under RCU protection without holding
@@ -1138,7 +1141,7 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct uprobe *uprobe, struct uprobe_consumer *uc)
	 */
	synchronize_srcu(&uprobes_srcu);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister);
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(uprobe_unregister_sync);

/**
 * uprobe_register - register a probe
@@ -1196,7 +1199,13 @@ struct uprobe *uprobe_register(struct inode *inode,
	up_write(&uprobe->register_rwsem);

	if (ret) {
		uprobe_unregister(uprobe, uc);
		uprobe_unregister_nosync(uprobe, uc);
		/*
		 * Registration might have partially succeeded, so we can have
		 * this consumer being called right at this time. We need to
		 * sync here. It's ok, it's unlikely slow path.
		 */
		uprobe_unregister_sync();
		return ERR_PTR(ret);
	}

+4 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -3184,7 +3184,10 @@ static void bpf_uprobe_unregister(struct bpf_uprobe *uprobes, u32 cnt)
	u32 i;

	for (i = 0; i < cnt; i++)
		uprobe_unregister(uprobes[i].uprobe, &uprobes[i].consumer);
		uprobe_unregister_nosync(uprobes[i].uprobe, &uprobes[i].consumer);

	if (cnt)
		uprobe_unregister_sync();
}

static void bpf_uprobe_multi_link_release(struct bpf_link *link)
+5 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1097,6 +1097,7 @@ static int trace_uprobe_enable(struct trace_uprobe *tu, filter_func_t filter)
static void __probe_event_disable(struct trace_probe *tp)
{
	struct trace_uprobe *tu;
	bool sync = false;

	tu = container_of(tp, struct trace_uprobe, tp);
	WARN_ON(!uprobe_filter_is_empty(tu->tp.event->filter));
@@ -1105,9 +1106,12 @@ static void __probe_event_disable(struct trace_probe *tp)
		if (!tu->uprobe)
			continue;

		uprobe_unregister(tu->uprobe, &tu->consumer);
		uprobe_unregister_nosync(tu->uprobe, &tu->consumer);
		sync = true;
		tu->uprobe = NULL;
	}
	if (sync)
		uprobe_unregister_sync();
}

static int probe_event_enable(struct trace_event_call *call,
+2 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -475,7 +475,8 @@ static void testmod_unregister_uprobe(void)
	mutex_lock(&testmod_uprobe_mutex);

	if (uprobe.uprobe) {
		uprobe_unregister(uprobe.uprobe, &uprobe.consumer);
		uprobe_unregister_nosync(uprobe.uprobe, &uprobe.consumer);
		uprobe_unregister_sync();
		path_put(&uprobe.path);
		uprobe.uprobe = NULL;
	}