Commit 1352eec8 authored by Gustavo A. R. Silva's avatar Gustavo A. R. Silva Committed by Martin K. Petersen
Browse files

scsi: ufs: core: Fix out-of-bounds warnings in ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd()

Fix the following out-of-bounds warnings by enclosing some structure
members into new structure objects upiu_req and upiu_rsp:

include/linux/fortify-string.h:20:29: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [29, 48] from the object at 'treq' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'req_header' with type 'struct utp_upiu_header' at offset 16 [-Warray-bounds]
include/linux/fortify-string.h:20:29: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [61, 80] from the object at 'treq' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'rsp_header' with type 'struct utp_upiu_header' at offset 48 [-Warray-bounds]
arch/m68k/include/asm/string.h:72:25: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [29, 48] from the object at 'treq' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'req_header' with type 'struct utp_upiu_header' at offset 16 [-Warray-bounds]
arch/m68k/include/asm/string.h:72:25: warning: '__builtin_memcpy' offset [61, 80] from the object at 'treq' is out of the bounds of referenced subobject 'rsp_header' with type 'struct utp_upiu_header' at offset 48 [-Warray-bounds]

Refactor the code by making it more structured.

The problem is that the original code is trying to copy data into a bunch
of struct members adjacent to each other in a single call to memcpy(). Now
that a new struct _upiu_req_ enclosing all those adjacent members is
introduced, memcpy() doesn't overrun the length of &treq.req_header,
because the address of the new struct object _upiu_req_ is used as the
destination, instead. The same problem is present when memcpy() overruns
the length of the source &treq.rsp_header; in this case the address of the
new struct object _upiu_rsp_ is used, instead.

Also, this helps with the ongoing efforts to enable -Warray-bounds and
avoid confusing the compiler.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/109
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/60640558.lsAxiK6otPwTo9rv%25lkp@intel.com/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210331224338.GA347171@embeddedor


Reported-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: default avatarAvri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarMartin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Build-tested-by: default avatarkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
parent aa6f2fcc
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+16 −12
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -327,11 +327,15 @@ static void ufshcd_add_tm_upiu_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba, unsigned int tag,
		return;

	if (str_t == UFS_TM_SEND)
		trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str_t, &descp->req_header,
				  &descp->input_param1, UFS_TSF_TM_INPUT);
		trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str_t,
				  &descp->upiu_req.req_header,
				  &descp->upiu_req.input_param1,
				  UFS_TSF_TM_INPUT);
	else
		trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str_t, &descp->rsp_header,
				  &descp->output_param1, UFS_TSF_TM_OUTPUT);
		trace_ufshcd_upiu(dev_name(hba->dev), str_t,
				  &descp->upiu_rsp.rsp_header,
				  &descp->upiu_rsp.output_param1,
				  UFS_TSF_TM_OUTPUT);
}

static void ufshcd_add_uic_command_trace(struct ufs_hba *hba,
@@ -6398,7 +6402,7 @@ static int __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
	spin_lock_irqsave(host->host_lock, flags);
	task_tag = hba->nutrs + free_slot;

	treq->req_header.dword_0 |= cpu_to_be32(task_tag);
	treq->upiu_req.req_header.dword_0 |= cpu_to_be32(task_tag);

	memcpy(hba->utmrdl_base_addr + free_slot, treq, sizeof(*treq));
	ufshcd_vops_setup_task_mgmt(hba, free_slot, tm_function);
@@ -6471,16 +6475,16 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba, int lun_id, int task_id,
	treq.header.dword_2 = cpu_to_le32(OCS_INVALID_COMMAND_STATUS);

	/* Configure task request UPIU */
	treq.req_header.dword_0 = cpu_to_be32(lun_id << 8) |
	treq.upiu_req.req_header.dword_0 = cpu_to_be32(lun_id << 8) |
				  cpu_to_be32(UPIU_TRANSACTION_TASK_REQ << 24);
	treq.req_header.dword_1 = cpu_to_be32(tm_function << 16);
	treq.upiu_req.req_header.dword_1 = cpu_to_be32(tm_function << 16);

	/*
	 * The host shall provide the same value for LUN field in the basic
	 * header and for Input Parameter.
	 */
	treq.input_param1 = cpu_to_be32(lun_id);
	treq.input_param2 = cpu_to_be32(task_id);
	treq.upiu_req.input_param1 = cpu_to_be32(lun_id);
	treq.upiu_req.input_param2 = cpu_to_be32(task_id);

	err = __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(hba, &treq, tm_function);
	if (err == -ETIMEDOUT)
@@ -6491,7 +6495,7 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba, int lun_id, int task_id,
		dev_err(hba->dev, "%s: failed, ocs = 0x%x\n",
				__func__, ocs_value);
	else if (tm_response)
		*tm_response = be32_to_cpu(treq.output_param1) &
		*tm_response = be32_to_cpu(treq.upiu_rsp.output_param1) &
				MASK_TM_SERVICE_RESP;
	return err;
}
@@ -6666,7 +6670,7 @@ int ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
		treq.header.dword_0 = cpu_to_le32(UTP_REQ_DESC_INT_CMD);
		treq.header.dword_2 = cpu_to_le32(OCS_INVALID_COMMAND_STATUS);

		memcpy(&treq.req_header, req_upiu, sizeof(*req_upiu));
		memcpy(&treq.upiu_req, req_upiu, sizeof(*req_upiu));

		err = __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(hba, &treq, tm_f);
		if (err == -ETIMEDOUT)
@@ -6679,7 +6683,7 @@ int ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
			break;
		}

		memcpy(rsp_upiu, &treq.rsp_header, sizeof(*rsp_upiu));
		memcpy(rsp_upiu, &treq.upiu_rsp, sizeof(*rsp_upiu));

		break;
	default:
+13 −9
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -486,17 +486,21 @@ struct utp_task_req_desc {
	struct request_desc_header header;

	/* DW 4-11 - Task request UPIU structure */
	struct {
		struct utp_upiu_header	req_header;
		__be32			input_param1;
		__be32			input_param2;
		__be32			input_param3;
		__be32			__reserved1[2];
	} upiu_req;

	/* DW 12-19 - Task Management Response UPIU structure */
	struct {
		struct utp_upiu_header	rsp_header;
		__be32			output_param1;
		__be32			output_param2;
		__be32			__reserved2[3];
	} upiu_rsp;
};

#endif /* End of Header */