Commit 165c8b02 authored by David Sterba's avatar David Sterba
Browse files

btrfs: use narrower type for btrfs_transaction::num_dirty_bgs 



The u64 is an overkill here, we could not possibly create that many
blockgroups in one transaction.

Signed-off-by: default avatarDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
parent 1ca4bb63

fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2894,7 +2894,7 @@ int btrfs_check_space_for_delayed_refs(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, 
	struct btrfs_block_rsv *global_rsv;

	u64 num_heads = trans->transaction->delayed_refs.num_heads_ready;

	u64 csum_bytes = trans->transaction->delayed_refs.pending_csums;

	u64 num_dirty_bgs = trans->transaction->num_dirty_bgs;

	unsigned int num_dirty_bgs = trans->transaction->num_dirty_bgs;

	u64 num_bytes, num_dirty_bgs_bytes;

	int ret = 0;

fs/btrfs/transaction.h

+1 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@ struct btrfs_transaction { 
	struct list_head dirty_bgs;

	struct list_head io_bgs;

	struct list_head dropped_roots;

	u64 num_dirty_bgs;

	unsigned int num_dirty_bgs;



	/*

	 * we need to make sure block group deletion doesn't race with