Commit 1722fb4a authored by Andy Shevchenko's avatar Andy Shevchenko Committed by Vinod Koul
Browse files

dmaengine: Add a comment on why it's okay when kasprintf() fails 



Add a comment in dma_request_chan() to clarify kasprintf() missing return
value check and it is correct functionality.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAndy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250205145757.889247-4-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarVinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
parent 1c83d3df

drivers/dma/dmaengine.c

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -854,8 +854,8 @@ struct dma_chan *dma_request_chan(struct device *dev, const char *name) 


found:

#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_FS

	chan->dbg_client_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s", dev_name(dev),

					  name);

	chan->dbg_client_name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s:%s", dev_name(dev), name);

	/* No functional issue if it fails, users are supposed to test before use */

#endif



	chan->name = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "dma:%s", name);