Commit 1810b210 authored by Matti Vaittinen's avatar Matti Vaittinen Committed by Lee Jones
Browse files

mfd: bd718x7: Use regmap_reg_range() for pmic_status_range



Initializing the regmap_ranges using direct assignment to the range_min
and range_max members is a slightly verbose. In general we can make it a
tad cleaner when using the regmap_reg_range() macro.

The rohm-bd718x7.c is doing this open-coded initialization. It's not
really bad as there is only one range defined, but it is still worth
converting it to use the regmap_reg_range() so no-one uses it as a bad
example.

Additionally, the regmap_access_table expects a pointer to an array of
ranges. This is a tad more obvious when we use an array with single
range, instead of claiming a pointer to a range struct being a single
element array.

Use regmap_reg_range() when initializing the regmap_range structure and
use a real one-element array instead of a pointer to a struct.

Signed-off-by: default avatarMatti Vaittinen <mazziesaccount@gmail.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/aP9hlpRO-0vmEHBZ@mva-rohm


Signed-off-by: default avatarLee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
parent 049929c5
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+4 −5
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -72,14 +72,13 @@ static const struct regmap_irq_chip bd718xx_irq_chip = {
	.init_ack_masked = true,
};

static const struct regmap_range pmic_status_range = {
	.range_min = BD718XX_REG_IRQ,
	.range_max = BD718XX_REG_POW_STATE,
static const struct regmap_range pmic_status_range[] = {
	regmap_reg_range(BD718XX_REG_IRQ, BD718XX_REG_POW_STATE),
};

static const struct regmap_access_table volatile_regs = {
	.yes_ranges = &pmic_status_range,
	.n_yes_ranges = 1,
	.yes_ranges = &pmic_status_range[0],
	.n_yes_ranges = ARRAY_SIZE(pmic_status_range),
};

static const struct regmap_config bd718xx_regmap_config = {