Commit 2d0cf10a authored by Ingo Molnar's avatar Ingo Molnar
Browse files

x86/alternatives: Use non-inverted logic instead of 'tp_order_fail()'



tp_order_fail() uses inverted logic: it returns true in case something
is false, which is only a plus at the IOCCC.

Instead rename it to regular parity as 'text_poke_addr_ordered()',
and adjust the code accordingly.

Also add a comment explaining how the address ordering should be
understood.

No change in functionality intended.

Signed-off-by: default avatarIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
Cc: "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250411054105.2341982-23-mingo@kernel.org
parent 87836af1
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+13 −7
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2841,28 +2841,34 @@ static void text_poke_int3_loc_init(struct smp_text_poke_loc *tp, void *addr,
 * We hard rely on the tp_vec being ordered; ensure this is so by flushing
 * early if needed.
 */
static bool tp_order_fail(void *addr)
static bool text_poke_addr_ordered(void *addr)
{
	struct smp_text_poke_loc *tp;

	if (!tp_vec_nr)
		return false;
		return true;

	if (!addr) /* force */
		return true;
		return false;

	/*
	 * If the last current entry's address is higher than the
	 * new entry's address we'd like to add, then ordering
	 * is violated and we must first flush all pending patching
	 * requests:
	 */
	tp = &tp_vec[tp_vec_nr-1];
	if ((unsigned long)text_poke_addr(tp) > (unsigned long)addr)
		return true;

		return false;

	return true;
}

static void smp_text_poke_batch_flush(void *addr)
{
	lockdep_assert_held(&text_mutex);

	if (tp_vec_nr == TP_VEC_MAX || tp_order_fail(addr)) {
	if (tp_vec_nr == TP_VEC_MAX || !text_poke_addr_ordered(addr)) {
		smp_text_poke_batch_process(tp_vec, tp_vec_nr);
		tp_vec_nr = 0;
	}