Commit 34c4eb7d authored by Karol Przybylski's avatar Karol Przybylski Committed by Alex Deucher
Browse files

drm/amdgpu: Fix potential integer overflow in scheduler mask calculations



The use of 1 << i in scheduler mask calculations can result in an
unintentional integer overflow due to the expression being
evaluated as a 32-bit signed integer.

This patch replaces 1 << i with 1ULL << i to ensure the operation
is performed as a 64-bit unsigned integer, preventing overflow

Discovered in coverity scan, CID 1636393, 1636175, 1636007, 1635853

Fixes: c5c63d9c ("drm/amdgpu: add amdgpu_gfx_sched_mask and amdgpu_compute_sched_mask debugfs")
Signed-off-by: default avatarKarol Przybylski <karprzy7@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAlex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
parent 8f2cd106
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+4 −4
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -2124,7 +2124,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_gfx_sched_mask_set(void *data, u64 val)
	if (!adev)
		return -ENODEV;

	mask = (1 << adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings) - 1;
	mask = (1ULL << adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings) - 1;
	if ((val & mask) == 0)
		return -EINVAL;

@@ -2152,7 +2152,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_gfx_sched_mask_get(void *data, u64 *val)
	for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_gfx_rings; ++i) {
		ring = &adev->gfx.gfx_ring[i];
		if (ring->sched.ready)
			mask |= 1 << i;
			mask |= 1ULL << i;
	}

	*val = mask;
@@ -2194,7 +2194,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_compute_sched_mask_set(void *data, u64 val)
	if (!adev)
		return -ENODEV;

	mask = (1 << adev->gfx.num_compute_rings) - 1;
	mask = (1ULL << adev->gfx.num_compute_rings) - 1;
	if ((val & mask) == 0)
		return -EINVAL;

@@ -2223,7 +2223,7 @@ static int amdgpu_debugfs_compute_sched_mask_get(void *data, u64 *val)
	for (i = 0; i < adev->gfx.num_compute_rings; ++i) {
		ring = &adev->gfx.compute_ring[i];
		if (ring->sched.ready)
			mask |= 1 << i;
			mask |= 1ULL << i;
	}

	*val = mask;