Commit 4621202a authored by Andrii Nakryiko's avatar Andrii Nakryiko Committed by Alexei Starovoitov
Browse files

bpf: generalize reg_set_min_max() to handle two sets of two registers



Change reg_set_min_max() to take FALSE/TRUE sets of two registers each,
instead of assuming that we are always comparing to a constant. For now
we still assume that right-hand side registers are constants (and make
sure that's the case by swapping src/dst regs, if necessary), but
subsequent patches will remove this limitation.

reg_set_min_max() is now called unconditionally for any register
comparison, so that might include pointer vs pointer. This makes it
consistent with is_branch_taken() generality. But we currently only
support adjustments based on SCALAR vs SCALAR comparisons, so
reg_set_min_max() has to guard itself againts pointers.

Taking two by two registers allows to further unify and simplify
check_cond_jmp_op() logic. We utilize fake register for BPF_K
conditional jump case, just like with is_branch_taken() part.

Acked-by: default avatarEduard Zingerman <eddyz87@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarAndrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231102033759.2541186-18-andrii@kernel.org


Signed-off-by: default avatarAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
parent 811476e9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+56 −75
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -14400,32 +14400,50 @@ static int is_branch_taken(struct bpf_reg_state *reg1, struct bpf_reg_state *reg
	return is_scalar_branch_taken(reg1, reg2, opcode, is_jmp32);
}
/* Adjusts the register min/max values in the case that the dst_reg is the
 * variable register that we are working on, and src_reg is a constant or we're
 * simply doing a BPF_K check.
 * In JEQ/JNE cases we also adjust the var_off values.
/* Adjusts the register min/max values in the case that the dst_reg and
 * src_reg are both SCALAR_VALUE registers (or we are simply doing a BPF_K
 * check, in which case we havea fake SCALAR_VALUE representing insn->imm).
 * Technically we can do similar adjustments for pointers to the same object,
 * but we don't support that right now.
 */
static void reg_set_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg1,
			    struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg2,
			    struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg1,
			    u64 uval, u32 uval32,
			    struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg2,
			    u8 opcode, bool is_jmp32)
{
	struct tnum false_32off = tnum_subreg(false_reg1->var_off);
	struct tnum false_64off = false_reg1->var_off;
	struct tnum true_32off = tnum_subreg(true_reg1->var_off);
	struct tnum true_64off = true_reg1->var_off;
	s64 sval = (s64)uval;
	s32 sval32 = (s32)uval32;
	struct tnum false_32off, false_64off;
	struct tnum true_32off, true_64off;
	u64 uval;
	u32 uval32;
	s64 sval;
	s32 sval32;
	/* If the dst_reg is a pointer, we can't learn anything about its
	 * variable offset from the compare (unless src_reg were a pointer into
	 * the same object, but we don't bother with that.
	 * Since false_reg1 and true_reg1 have the same type by construction, we
	 * only need to check one of them for pointerness.
	/* If either register is a pointer, we can't learn anything about its
	 * variable offset from the compare (unless they were a pointer into
	 * the same object, but we don't bother with that).
	 */
	if (__is_pointer_value(false, false_reg1))
	if (false_reg1->type != SCALAR_VALUE || false_reg2->type != SCALAR_VALUE)
		return;
	/* we expect right-hand registers (src ones) to be constants, for now */
	if (!is_reg_const(false_reg2, is_jmp32)) {
		opcode = flip_opcode(opcode);
		swap(true_reg1, true_reg2);
		swap(false_reg1, false_reg2);
	}
	if (!is_reg_const(false_reg2, is_jmp32))
		return;
	false_32off = tnum_subreg(false_reg1->var_off);
	false_64off = false_reg1->var_off;
	true_32off = tnum_subreg(true_reg1->var_off);
	true_64off = true_reg1->var_off;
	uval = false_reg2->var_off.value;
	uval32 = (u32)tnum_subreg(false_reg2->var_off).value;
	sval = (s64)uval;
	sval32 = (s32)uval32;
	switch (opcode) {
	/* JEQ/JNE comparison doesn't change the register equivalence.
	 *
@@ -14562,22 +14580,6 @@ static void reg_set_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg1,
	}
}
/* Same as above, but for the case that dst_reg holds a constant and src_reg is
 * the variable reg.
 */
static void reg_set_min_max_inv(struct bpf_reg_state *true_reg,
				struct bpf_reg_state *false_reg,
				u64 uval, u32 uval32,
				u8 opcode, bool is_jmp32)
{
	opcode = flip_opcode(opcode);
	/* This uses zero as "not present in table"; luckily the zero opcode,
	 * BPF_JA, can't get here.
	 */
	if (opcode)
		reg_set_min_max(true_reg, false_reg, uval, uval32, opcode, is_jmp32);
}
/* Regs are known to be equal, so intersect their min/max/var_off */
static void __reg_combine_min_max(struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg,
				  struct bpf_reg_state *dst_reg)
@@ -14902,53 +14904,32 @@ static int check_cond_jmp_op(struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
		return -EFAULT;
	other_branch_regs = other_branch->frame[other_branch->curframe]->regs;
	/* detect if we are comparing against a constant value so we can adjust
	 * our min/max values for our dst register.
	 * this is only legit if both are scalars (or pointers to the same
	 * object, I suppose, see the PTR_MAYBE_NULL related if block below),
	 * because otherwise the different base pointers mean the offsets aren't
	 * comparable.
	 */
	if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X) {
		struct bpf_reg_state *src_reg = &regs[insn->src_reg];
		reg_set_min_max(&other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg],
				&other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg],
				dst_reg, src_reg, opcode, is_jmp32);
		if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE &&
		    src_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
			if (tnum_is_const(src_reg->var_off) ||
			    (is_jmp32 &&
			     tnum_is_const(tnum_subreg(src_reg->var_off))))
				reg_set_min_max(&other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg],
						dst_reg,
						src_reg->var_off.value,
						tnum_subreg(src_reg->var_off).value,
						opcode, is_jmp32);
			else if (tnum_is_const(dst_reg->var_off) ||
				 (is_jmp32 &&
				  tnum_is_const(tnum_subreg(dst_reg->var_off))))
				reg_set_min_max_inv(&other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg],
						    src_reg,
						    dst_reg->var_off.value,
						    tnum_subreg(dst_reg->var_off).value,
						    opcode, is_jmp32);
			else if (!is_jmp32 &&
				 (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE))
		    src_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE &&
		    !is_jmp32 && (opcode == BPF_JEQ || opcode == BPF_JNE)) {
			/* Comparing for equality, we can combine knowledge */
			reg_combine_min_max(&other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg],
					    &other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg],
					    src_reg, dst_reg, opcode);
			if (src_reg->id &&
			    !WARN_ON_ONCE(src_reg->id != other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg].id)) {
				find_equal_scalars(this_branch, src_reg);
				find_equal_scalars(other_branch, &other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg]);
			}
		}
	} else if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE) {
	} else /* BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_K */ {
		reg_set_min_max(&other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg],
					dst_reg, insn->imm, (u32)insn->imm,
				src_reg /* fake one */,
				dst_reg, src_reg /* same fake one */,
				opcode, is_jmp32);
	}
	if (BPF_SRC(insn->code) == BPF_X &&
	    src_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && src_reg->id &&
	    !WARN_ON_ONCE(src_reg->id != other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg].id)) {
		find_equal_scalars(this_branch, src_reg);
		find_equal_scalars(other_branch, &other_branch_regs[insn->src_reg]);
	}
	if (dst_reg->type == SCALAR_VALUE && dst_reg->id &&
	    !WARN_ON_ONCE(dst_reg->id != other_branch_regs[insn->dst_reg].id)) {
		find_equal_scalars(this_branch, dst_reg);