+5
−9
Loading
On a SEQ_MISORDERED error, the current code will reattempt the call, but set the slot sequence ID to 1. I can find no mention of this remedy in the spec, and it seems potentially dangerous. It's possible that the last call was sent with seqid 1, and doing this will cause a retransmission of the reply. Drop this special handling, and always treat SEQ_MISORDERED like BADSLOT. Retry the call, but leak the slot so that it is no longer used. Signed-off-by:Jeff Layton <jlayton@kernel.org> Signed-off-by:
Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@oracle.com>