Commit 5ab24969 authored by Fuad Tabba's avatar Fuad Tabba Committed by Marc Zyngier
Browse files

KVM: arm64: Reimplement vgic-debug XArray iteration



The vgic-debug interface implementation uses XArray marks
(`LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER`) to "snapshot" LPIs at the start of iteration.
This modifies global state for a read-only operation and complicates
reference counting, leading to leaks if iteration is aborted or fails.

Reimplement the iterator to use dynamic iteration logic:

- Remove `lpi_idx` from `struct vgic_state_iter`.
- Replace the XArray marking mechanism with dynamic iteration using
  `xa_find_after(..., XA_PRESENT)`.
- Wrap XArray traversals in `rcu_read_lock()`/`rcu_read_unlock()` to
  ensure safety against concurrent modifications (e.g., LPI unmapping).
- Handle potential races where an LPI is removed during iteration by
  gracefully skipping it in `show()`, rather than warning.
- Remove the unused `LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER` definition.

This simplifies the lifecycle management of the iterator and prevents
resource leaks associated with the marking mechanism, and paves the way
for using a standard seq_file iterator.

Signed-off-by: default avatarFuad Tabba <tabba@google.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260202085721.3954942-3-tabba@google.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarMarc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
parent dcd79ed4
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+20 −48
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -25,11 +25,9 @@
struct vgic_state_iter {
	int nr_cpus;
	int nr_spis;
	int nr_lpis;
	int dist_id;
	int vcpu_id;
	unsigned long intid;
	int lpi_idx;
};

static void iter_next(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_state_iter *iter)
@@ -45,13 +43,15 @@ static void iter_next(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_state_iter *iter)
	 * Let the xarray drive the iterator after the last SPI, as the iterator
	 * has exhausted the sequentially-allocated INTID space.
	 */
	if (iter->intid >= (iter->nr_spis + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS - 1) &&
	    iter->nr_lpis) {
		if (iter->lpi_idx < iter->nr_lpis)
			xa_find_after(&dist->lpi_xa, &iter->intid,
				      VGIC_LPI_MAX_INTID,
				      LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER);
		iter->lpi_idx++;
	if (iter->intid >= (iter->nr_spis + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS - 1)) {
		if (iter->intid == VGIC_LPI_MAX_INTID + 1)
			return;

		rcu_read_lock();
		if (!xa_find_after(&dist->lpi_xa, &iter->intid,
				   VGIC_LPI_MAX_INTID, XA_PRESENT))
			iter->intid = VGIC_LPI_MAX_INTID + 1;
		rcu_read_unlock();
		return;
	}

@@ -61,44 +61,21 @@ static void iter_next(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_state_iter *iter)
		iter->intid = 0;
}

static int iter_mark_lpis(struct kvm *kvm)
static int vgic_count_lpis(struct kvm *kvm)
{
	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
	unsigned long intid, flags;
	struct vgic_irq *irq;
	unsigned long intid;
	int nr_lpis = 0;

	xa_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);

	xa_for_each(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq) {
		if (!vgic_try_get_irq_ref(irq))
			continue;

		__xa_set_mark(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER);
	rcu_read_lock();
	xa_for_each(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq)
		nr_lpis++;
	}

	xa_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);
	rcu_read_unlock();

	return nr_lpis;
}

static void iter_unmark_lpis(struct kvm *kvm)
{
	struct vgic_dist *dist = &kvm->arch.vgic;
	unsigned long intid, flags;
	struct vgic_irq *irq;

	xa_for_each_marked(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, irq, LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER) {
		xa_lock_irqsave(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);
		__xa_clear_mark(&dist->lpi_xa, intid, LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER);
		xa_unlock_irqrestore(&dist->lpi_xa, flags);

		/* vgic_put_irq() expects to be called outside of the xa_lock */
		vgic_put_irq(kvm, irq);
	}
}

static void iter_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_state_iter *iter,
		      loff_t pos)
{
@@ -108,8 +85,6 @@ static void iter_init(struct kvm *kvm, struct vgic_state_iter *iter,

	iter->nr_cpus = nr_cpus;
	iter->nr_spis = kvm->arch.vgic.nr_spis;
	if (kvm->arch.vgic.vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3)
		iter->nr_lpis = iter_mark_lpis(kvm);

	/* Fast forward to the right position if needed */
	while (pos--)
@@ -121,7 +96,7 @@ static bool end_of_vgic(struct vgic_state_iter *iter)
	return iter->dist_id > 0 &&
		iter->vcpu_id == iter->nr_cpus &&
		iter->intid >= (iter->nr_spis + VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS) &&
		(!iter->nr_lpis || iter->lpi_idx > iter->nr_lpis);
		iter->intid > VGIC_LPI_MAX_INTID;
}

static void *vgic_debug_start(struct seq_file *s, loff_t *pos)
@@ -178,7 +153,6 @@ static void vgic_debug_stop(struct seq_file *s, void *v)

	mutex_lock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
	iter = kvm->arch.vgic.iter;
	iter_unmark_lpis(kvm);
	kfree(iter);
	kvm->arch.vgic.iter = NULL;
	mutex_unlock(&kvm->arch.config_lock);
@@ -188,13 +162,14 @@ static void print_dist_state(struct seq_file *s, struct vgic_dist *dist,
			     struct vgic_state_iter *iter)
{
	bool v3 = dist->vgic_model == KVM_DEV_TYPE_ARM_VGIC_V3;
	struct kvm *kvm = s->private;

	seq_printf(s, "Distributor\n");
	seq_printf(s, "===========\n");
	seq_printf(s, "vgic_model:\t%s\n", v3 ? "GICv3" : "GICv2");
	seq_printf(s, "nr_spis:\t%d\n", dist->nr_spis);
	if (v3)
		seq_printf(s, "nr_lpis:\t%d\n", iter->nr_lpis);
		seq_printf(s, "nr_lpis:\t%d\n", vgic_count_lpis(kvm));
	seq_printf(s, "enabled:\t%d\n", dist->enabled);
	seq_printf(s, "\n");

@@ -291,16 +266,13 @@ static int vgic_debug_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
	if (iter->vcpu_id < iter->nr_cpus)
		vcpu = kvm_get_vcpu(kvm, iter->vcpu_id);

	/*
	 * Expect this to succeed, as iter_mark_lpis() takes a reference on
	 * every LPI to be visited.
	 */
	if (iter->intid < VGIC_NR_PRIVATE_IRQS)
		irq = vgic_get_vcpu_irq(vcpu, iter->intid);
	else
		irq = vgic_get_irq(kvm, iter->intid);
	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!irq))
		return -EINVAL;

	if (!irq)
		return 0;

	raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&irq->irq_lock, flags);
	print_irq_state(s, irq, vcpu);
+0 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -300,7 +300,6 @@ struct vgic_dist {
	 */
	u64			propbaser;

#define LPI_XA_MARK_DEBUG_ITER	XA_MARK_0
	struct xarray		lpi_xa;

	/* used by vgic-debug */