Loading
rust: pin-init: internal: init: remove `#[disable_initialized_field_access]`
Gary noticed [1] that the initializer macros as well as the `[Pin]Init` traits cannot support unaligned fields, since they use operations that require aligned pointers. This means that any code using structs with unaligned fields in pin-init is unsound. By default, the `init!` macro generates references to initialized fields, which makes the compiler check that those fields are aligned. However, we added the `#[disable_initialized_field_access]` attribute to avoid this behavior in commit ceca298c ("rust: pin-init: internal: init: add escape hatch for referencing initialized fields"). Thus remove the `#[disable_initialized_field_access]` attribute from `init!`, which is the only safe way to create an initializer handling unaligned fields. If support for in-place initializing structs with unaligned fields is required in the future, we could figure out a solution. This is tracked in [2]. Reported-by:Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Closes: https://rust-for-linux.zulipchat.com/#narrow/channel/561532-pin-init/topic/initialized.20field.20accessor.20detection/with/576210658 [1] Link: https://github.com/Rust-for-Linux/pin-init/issues/112 [2] Fixes: ceca298c ("rust: pin-init: internal: init: add escape hatch for referencing initialized fields") Signed-off-by:
Benno Lossin <lossin@kernel.org> Acked-by:
Janne Grunau <j@jannau.net> Reviewed-by:
Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net> Reviewed-by:
Alice Ryhl <aliceryhl@google.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260302140424.4097655-1-lossin@kernel.org [ Adjusted tags and reworded as discussed. - Miguel ] Signed-off-by:
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>