Commit a54ad727 authored by Florian Westphal's avatar Florian Westphal Committed by Steffen Klassert
Browse files

xfrm: policy: remove remaining use of inexact list



No consumers anymore, remove it.  After this, insertion of policies
no longer require list walk of all inexact policies but only those
that are reachable via the candidate sets.

This gives almost linear insertion speeds provided the inserted
policies are for non-overlapping networks.

Before:
Inserted 1000   policies in 70 ms
Inserted 10000  policies in 1155 ms
Inserted 100000 policies in 216848 ms

After:
Inserted 1000   policies in 56 ms
Inserted 10000  policies in 478 ms
Inserted 100000 policies in 4580 ms

Insertion of 1m entries takes about ~40s after this change
on my test vm.

Cc: Noel Kuntze <noel@familie-kuntze.de>
Cc: Tobias Brunner <tobias@strongswan.org>
Signed-off-by: default avatarFlorian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: default avatarSteffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
parent 563d5ca9
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+0 −1
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -555,7 +555,6 @@ struct xfrm_policy {
	u16			family;
	struct xfrm_sec_ctx	*security;
	struct xfrm_tmpl       	xfrm_vec[XFRM_MAX_DEPTH];
	struct hlist_node	bydst_inexact_list;
	struct rcu_head		rcu;

	struct xfrm_dev_offload xdo;
+0 −38
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -196,8 +196,6 @@ xfrm_policy_inexact_lookup_rcu(struct net *net,
static struct xfrm_policy *
xfrm_policy_insert_list(struct hlist_head *chain, struct xfrm_policy *policy,
			bool excl);
static void xfrm_policy_insert_inexact_list(struct hlist_head *chain,
					    struct xfrm_policy *policy);

static bool
xfrm_policy_find_inexact_candidates(struct xfrm_pol_inexact_candidates *cand,
@@ -410,7 +408,6 @@ struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_alloc(struct net *net, gfp_t gfp)
	if (policy) {
		write_pnet(&policy->xp_net, net);
		INIT_LIST_HEAD(&policy->walk.all);
		INIT_HLIST_NODE(&policy->bydst_inexact_list);
		INIT_HLIST_NODE(&policy->bydst);
		INIT_HLIST_NODE(&policy->byidx);
		rwlock_init(&policy->lock);
@@ -1228,9 +1225,6 @@ xfrm_policy_inexact_insert(struct xfrm_policy *policy, u8 dir, int excl)
		return ERR_PTR(-EEXIST);
	}

	chain = &net->xfrm.policy_inexact[dir];
	xfrm_policy_insert_inexact_list(chain, policy);

	if (delpol)
		__xfrm_policy_inexact_prune_bin(bin, false);

@@ -1346,7 +1340,6 @@ static void xfrm_hash_rebuild(struct work_struct *work)
		}

		hlist_del_rcu(&policy->bydst);
		hlist_del_init(&policy->bydst_inexact_list);

		newpos = NULL;
		chain = policy_hash_bysel(net, &policy->selector,
@@ -1515,36 +1508,6 @@ static const struct rhashtable_params xfrm_pol_inexact_params = {
	.automatic_shrinking	= true,
};

static void xfrm_policy_insert_inexact_list(struct hlist_head *chain,
					    struct xfrm_policy *policy)
{
	struct xfrm_policy *pol, *delpol = NULL;
	struct hlist_node *newpos = NULL;

	hlist_for_each_entry(pol, chain, bydst_inexact_list) {
		if (pol->type == policy->type &&
		    pol->if_id == policy->if_id &&
		    !selector_cmp(&pol->selector, &policy->selector) &&
		    xfrm_policy_mark_match(&policy->mark, pol) &&
		    xfrm_sec_ctx_match(pol->security, policy->security) &&
		    !WARN_ON(delpol)) {
			delpol = pol;
			if (policy->priority > pol->priority)
				continue;
		} else if (policy->priority >= pol->priority) {
			newpos = &pol->bydst_inexact_list;
			continue;
		}
		if (delpol)
			break;
	}

	if (newpos && policy->xdo.type != XFRM_DEV_OFFLOAD_PACKET)
		hlist_add_behind_rcu(&policy->bydst_inexact_list, newpos);
	else
		hlist_add_head_rcu(&policy->bydst_inexact_list, chain);
}

static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_policy_insert_list(struct hlist_head *chain,
						   struct xfrm_policy *policy,
						   bool excl)
@@ -2346,7 +2309,6 @@ static struct xfrm_policy *__xfrm_policy_unlink(struct xfrm_policy *pol,
	/* Socket policies are not hashed. */
	if (!hlist_unhashed(&pol->bydst)) {
		hlist_del_rcu(&pol->bydst);
		hlist_del_init(&pol->bydst_inexact_list);
		hlist_del(&pol->byidx);
	}