Commit b87eee38 authored by Ulf Hansson's avatar Ulf Hansson
Browse files

pmdomain: core: Don't hold the genpd-lock when calling dev_pm_domain_set()



There is no need to hold the genpd-lock, while assigning the
dev->pm_domain. In fact, it becomes a problem on a PREEMPT_RT based
configuration as the genpd-lock may be a raw spinlock, while the lock
acquired through the call to dev_pm_domain_set() is a regular spinlock.

To fix the problem, let's simply move the calls to dev_pm_domain_set()
outside the genpd-lock.

Signed-off-by: default avatarUlf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>
Tested-by: Raghavendra Kakarla <quic_rkakarla@quicinc.com>  # qcm6490 with PREEMPT_RT set
Acked-by: default avatarSebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240527142557.321610-3-ulf.hansson@linaro.org
parent d7bdb8e6
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+3 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -1800,7 +1800,6 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
	genpd_lock(genpd);

	genpd_set_cpumask(genpd, gpd_data->cpu);
	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, &genpd->domain);

	genpd->device_count++;
	if (gd)
@@ -1809,6 +1808,7 @@ static int genpd_add_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd, struct device *dev,
	list_add_tail(&gpd_data->base.list_node, &genpd->dev_list);

	genpd_unlock(genpd);
	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, &genpd->domain);
 out:
	if (ret)
		genpd_free_dev_data(dev, gpd_data);
@@ -1865,12 +1865,13 @@ static int genpd_remove_device(struct generic_pm_domain *genpd,
		genpd->gd->max_off_time_changed = true;

	genpd_clear_cpumask(genpd, gpd_data->cpu);
	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, NULL);

	list_del_init(&pdd->list_node);

	genpd_unlock(genpd);

	dev_pm_domain_set(dev, NULL);

	if (genpd->detach_dev)
		genpd->detach_dev(genpd, dev);