+6
−0
Loading
nilfs_ioctl_mark_blocks_dirty() uses bd_oblocknr to detect dead blocks by comparing it with the current block number bd_blocknr. If they differ, the block is considered dead and skipped. However, bd_oblocknr should never be 0 since block 0 typically stores the primary superblock and is never a valid GC target block. A corrupted ioctl request with bd_oblocknr set to 0 causes the comparison to incorrectly match when the lookup returns -ENOENT and sets bd_blocknr to 0, bypassing the dead block check and calling nilfs_bmap_mark() on a non-existent block. This causes nilfs_btree_do_lookup() to return -ENOENT, triggering the WARN_ON(ret == -ENOENT). Fix this by rejecting ioctl requests with bd_oblocknr set to 0 at the beginning of each iteration. [ryusuke: slightly modified the commit message and comments for accuracy] Fixes: 7942b919 ("nilfs2: ioctl operations") Reported-by:<syzbot+98a040252119df0506f8@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=98a040252119df0506f8 Suggested-by:
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Deepanshu Kartikey <Kartikey406@gmail.com> Reported-by:
<syzbot+466a45fcfb0562f5b9a0@syzkaller.appspotmail.com> Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=466a45fcfb0562f5b9a0 Cc: Junjie Cao <junjie.cao@linux.dev> Signed-off-by:
Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com> Signed-off-by:
Viacheslav Dubeyko <slava@dubeyko.com>