drm/i915: Introduce intel_set_rps()

Replace the valleyview_set_rps() and gen6_set_rps() calls with
intel_set_rps() which itself does the IS_VALLEYVIEW() check. The
code becomes simpler since the callers don't have to do this check
themselves.

Most of the change was performe with the following semantic patch:
@@
expression E1, E2, E3;
@@
- if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(E1)) {
-  valleyview_set_rps(E2, E3);
- } else {
-  gen6_set_rps(E2, E3);
- }
+ intel_set_rps(E2, E3);

Adding intel_set_rps() and making valleyview_set_rps() and gen6_set_rps()
static was done manually. Also valleyview_set_rps() had to be moved a
bit avoid a forward declaration.

v2: Use a less greedy semantic patch

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Suggested-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This commit is contained in:
Ville Syrjälä
2015-02-02 19:09:50 +02:00
committed by Daniel Vetter
parent ab8d66752a
commit ffe02b403d
5 changed files with 34 additions and 47 deletions

View File

@@ -402,10 +402,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_max_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
/* We still need *_set_rps to process the new max_delay and
* update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
* frequency request may be unchanged. */
if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
valleyview_set_rps(dev, val);
else
gen6_set_rps(dev, val);
intel_set_rps(dev, val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);
@@ -464,10 +461,7 @@ static ssize_t gt_min_freq_mhz_store(struct device *kdev,
/* We still need *_set_rps to process the new min_delay and
* update the interrupt limits and PMINTRMSK even though
* frequency request may be unchanged. */
if (IS_VALLEYVIEW(dev))
valleyview_set_rps(dev, val);
else
gen6_set_rps(dev, val);
intel_set_rps(dev, val);
mutex_unlock(&dev_priv->rps.hw_lock);