power-domain is required for the sc7180 dispcc GDSC but not every qcom SoC
has a similar dependency for example the apq8064.
Most Qcom SoC's using mdss-dsi-ctrl seem to have the ability to
power-collapse the MDP without collapsing DSI.
For example the qcom vendor kernel commit for apq8084, msm8226, msm8916,
msm8974.
7b5c011a77
"ARM: dts: msm: add mdss gdsc supply to dsi controller device
It is possible for the DSI controller to be active when MDP is
power collapsed. DSI controller needs to have it's own vote for
mdss gdsc to ensure that gdsc remains on in such cases."
This however doesn't appear to be the case for the apq8064 so we shouldn't
be marking power-domain as required in yaml checks.
Fixes: 4dbe55c977 ("dt-bindings: msm: dsi: add yaml schemas for DSI bindings")
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Patchwork: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/515958/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20221223021025.1646636-3-bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org
Signed-off-by: Abhinav Kumar <quic_abhinavk@quicinc.com>
Adding in msm8939 which is based msm8916 dtsi I stumbled across a binding
check complaining about the phy name for msm8916 which we were reusing for
msm8939.
The currently inconsistent upstream dtsi naming of "dsi" and "dsi-phy" is
not captured in the yaml for this driver.
The driver however doesn't care about the name of DSI phy, hence the yaml
check is redundant.
Both Krzysztof and Rob suggested we could drop the phy-names entirely if it
really isn't a dependency.
So, drop the inconsistent and unnecessary phy-names field from the yaml.
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonoghue@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org>
