Commit 837ed303 authored by Ming Lei's avatar Ming Lei Committed by Jens Axboe
Browse files

loop: add hint for handling aio via IOCB_NOWAIT

Add hint for using IOCB_NOWAIT to handle loop aio command for avoiding
to cause write(especially randwrite) perf regression on sparse backed file.

Try IOCB_NOWAIT in the following situations:

- backing file is block device

OR

- READ aio command

OR

- there isn't any queued blocking async WRITEs, because NOWAIT won't cause
contention with blocking WRITE, which often implies exclusive lock

With this simple policy, perf regression of randwrite/write on sparse
backing file is fixed.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/dm-devel/7d6ae2c9-df8e-50d0-7ad6-b787cb3cfab4@redhat.com/


Signed-off-by: default avatarMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: default avatarJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
parent 0ba93a90
Loading
Loading
Loading
Loading
+61 −0
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -68,6 +68,7 @@ struct loop_device {
	struct rb_root          worker_tree;
	struct timer_list       timer;
	bool			sysfs_inited;
	unsigned 		lo_nr_blocking_writes;

	struct request_queue	*lo_queue;
	struct blk_mq_tag_set	tag_set;
@@ -467,6 +468,33 @@ static int lo_rw_aio(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
	return -EIOCBQUEUED;
}

static inline bool lo_aio_try_nowait(struct loop_device *lo,
		struct loop_cmd *cmd)
{
	struct file *file = lo->lo_backing_file;
	struct inode *inode = file->f_mapping->host;
	struct request *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);

	/* NOWAIT works fine for backing block device */
	if (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode))
		return true;

	/*
	 * NOWAIT is supposed to be fine for READ without contending with
	 * blocking WRITE
	 */
	if (req_op(rq) == REQ_OP_READ)
		return true;

	/*
	 * If there is any queued non-NOWAIT async WRITE , don't try new
	 * NOWAIT WRITE for avoiding contention
	 *
	 * Here we focus on handling stable FS block mapping via NOWAIT
	 */
	return READ_ONCE(lo->lo_nr_blocking_writes) == 0;
}

static int lo_rw_aio_nowait(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
			    int rw)
{
@@ -478,6 +506,9 @@ static int lo_rw_aio_nowait(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd,
	if (unlikely(ret))
		goto fail;

	if (!lo_aio_try_nowait(lo, cmd))
		return -EAGAIN;

	cmd->iocb.ki_flags |= IOCB_NOWAIT;
	ret = lo_submit_rw_aio(lo, cmd, nr_bvec, rw);
fail:
@@ -780,12 +811,19 @@ static ssize_t loop_attr_dio_show(struct loop_device *lo, char *buf)
	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", dio ? "1" : "0");
}

static ssize_t loop_attr_nr_blocking_writes_show(struct loop_device *lo,
						 char *buf)
{
	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", lo->lo_nr_blocking_writes);
}

LOOP_ATTR_RO(backing_file);
LOOP_ATTR_RO(offset);
LOOP_ATTR_RO(sizelimit);
LOOP_ATTR_RO(autoclear);
LOOP_ATTR_RO(partscan);
LOOP_ATTR_RO(dio);
LOOP_ATTR_RO(nr_blocking_writes);

static struct attribute *loop_attrs[] = {
	&loop_attr_backing_file.attr,
@@ -794,6 +832,7 @@ static struct attribute *loop_attrs[] = {
	&loop_attr_autoclear.attr,
	&loop_attr_partscan.attr,
	&loop_attr_dio.attr,
	&loop_attr_nr_blocking_writes.attr,
	NULL,
};

@@ -869,6 +908,24 @@ static inline int queue_on_root_worker(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
}
#endif

static inline void loop_inc_blocking_writes(struct loop_device *lo,
		struct loop_cmd *cmd)
{
	lockdep_assert_held(&lo->lo_work_lock);

	if (req_op(blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd)) == REQ_OP_WRITE)
		lo->lo_nr_blocking_writes += 1;
}

static inline void loop_dec_blocking_writes(struct loop_device *lo,
		struct loop_cmd *cmd)
{
	lockdep_assert_held(&lo->lo_work_lock);

	if (req_op(blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd)) == REQ_OP_WRITE)
		lo->lo_nr_blocking_writes -= 1;
}

static void loop_queue_work(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd)
{
	struct request __maybe_unused *rq = blk_mq_rq_from_pdu(cmd);
@@ -951,6 +1008,8 @@ static void loop_queue_work(struct loop_device *lo, struct loop_cmd *cmd)
		work = &lo->rootcg_work;
		cmd_list = &lo->rootcg_cmd_list;
	}
	if (cmd->use_aio)
		loop_inc_blocking_writes(lo, cmd);
	list_add_tail(&cmd->list_entry, cmd_list);
	queue_work(lo->workqueue, work);
	spin_unlock_irq(&lo->lo_work_lock);
@@ -2052,6 +2111,8 @@ static void loop_process_work(struct loop_worker *worker,
		cond_resched();

		spin_lock_irq(&lo->lo_work_lock);
		if (cmd->use_aio)
			loop_dec_blocking_writes(lo, cmd);
	}

	/*