+1
−1
Loading
[BUG] When running btrfs/284 with 64K page size and 4K fs block size, it crashes with the following ASSERT() triggered: assertion failed: folio_size(fi.folio) == blocksize :: 0, in fs/btrfs/zstd.c:603 ------------[ cut here ]------------ kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/zstd.c:603! Internal error: Oops - BUG: 00000000f2000800 [#1] SMP CPU: 2 UID: 0 PID: 1183 Comm: kworker/u35:4 Not tainted 6.19.0-rc8-custom+ #185 PREEMPT(voluntary) Hardware name: QEMU KVM Virtual Machine, BIOS unknown 2/2/2022 Workqueue: btrfs-endio simple_end_io_work [btrfs] pc : zstd_decompress_bio+0x4f0/0x508 [btrfs] lr : zstd_decompress_bio+0x4f0/0x508 [btrfs] Call trace: zstd_decompress_bio+0x4f0/0x508 [btrfs] (P) end_bbio_compressed_read+0x260/0x2c0 [btrfs] btrfs_bio_end_io+0xc4/0x258 [btrfs] btrfs_check_read_bio+0x424/0x7e0 [btrfs] simple_end_io_work+0x40/0xa8 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x168/0x3f0 worker_thread+0x25c/0x398 kthread+0x154/0x250 ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20 ---[ end trace 0000000000000000 ]--- [CAUSE] Commit 1914b942 ("btrfs: zstd: use folio_iter to handle zstd_decompress_bio()") added the ASSERT() to make sure the folio size matches the fs block size. But the check is completely wrong, the original intention is to make sure for bs > ps cases, we always got a large folio that covers a full fs block. However for bs < ps cases, a folio can never be smaller than page size, and the ASSERT() gets triggered immediately. [FIX] Check the folio size against @min_folio_size instead, which will never be smaller than PAGE_SIZE, and still cover bs > ps cases. Fixes: 1914b942 ("btrfs: zstd: use folio_iter to handle zstd_decompress_bio()") Reviewed-by:Filipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by:
David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>