Commit 9b9e32f7 authored by Alok Tiwari's avatar Alok Tiwari Committed by Leon Romanovsky
Browse files

RDMA/bnxt_re: Fix incorrect errno used in function comments 



The function comments in qplib_rcfw.c mention -ETIMEOUT as a
possible return value. However, the correct errno is -ETIMEDOUT.

Update the comments to reflect the proper return value to avoid
confusion for developers and users referring to the code.

Signed-off-by: default avatarAlok Tiwari <alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250921081854.1059094-1-alok.a.tiwari@oracle.com


Signed-off-by: default avatarLeon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
parent 4b6b6233

drivers/infiniband/hw/bnxt_re/qplib_rcfw.c

+2 −2
Original line number Diff line number Diff line
@@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int __wait_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie) 
 * wait for command completion. Maximum holding interval is 8 second.

 *

 * Returns:

 * -ETIMEOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.

 * -ETIMEDOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.

 * 0 if command is completed by firmware.

 */

static int __block_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie)
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@ static int __send_message(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, 
 * This function can not be called from non-sleepable context.

 *

 * Returns:

 * -ETIMEOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.

 * -ETIMEDOUT if command is not completed in specific time interval.

 * 0 if command is completed by firmware.

 */

static int __poll_for_resp(struct bnxt_qplib_rcfw *rcfw, u16 cookie)