PM: EM: Rework the depends on for CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL
Now not only CPUs can use energy efficiency models, but GPUs can also use. On the other hand, even with only one CPU, we can also use energy_model to align control in thermal. So remove the dependence of SMP, and add the DEVFREQ. Signed-off-by: Jeson Gao <jeson.gao@unisoc.com> [Added missing SMP config option in DTPM_CPU dependency] Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba <lukasz.luba@arm.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250307132649.4056210-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com [ rjw: Subject edits ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3ee7be9e10
commit
17f08280cf
|
@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ config DTPM
|
|||
|
||||
config DTPM_CPU
|
||||
bool "Add CPU power capping based on the energy model"
|
||||
depends on DTPM && ENERGY_MODEL
|
||||
depends on DTPM && ENERGY_MODEL && SMP
|
||||
help
|
||||
This enables support for CPU power limitation based on
|
||||
energy model.
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -380,8 +380,7 @@ config CPU_PM
|
|||
|
||||
config ENERGY_MODEL
|
||||
bool "Energy Model for devices with DVFS (CPUs, GPUs, etc)"
|
||||
depends on SMP
|
||||
depends on CPU_FREQ
|
||||
depends on CPU_FREQ || PM_DEVFREQ
|
||||
help
|
||||
Several subsystems (thermal and/or the task scheduler for example)
|
||||
can leverage information about the energy consumed by devices to
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue