Rust 'rustfmt' cleanup

'rustfmt', by default, formats imports in a way that is prone to
 conflicts while merging and rebasing, since in some cases it condenses
 several items into the same line.
 
 Document in our guidelines that we will handle this for the moment with
 the trailing empty comment workaround and make the tree 'rustfmt'-clean
 again.
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEPjU5OPd5QIZ9jqqOGXyLc2htIW0FAmjzy+0ACgkQGXyLc2ht
 IW2K9BAAmdHFQlI5kE2qFBVrk5JeTBmr/3GJ7wzPXKgQ/XdKgYILK5qx8SaqXo95
 RXnGSFzPXmVx1xds5NojVqJ65gnoyL9KK4qsxFOUVVoH2vjSWXL5DFrRDcVKFlGY
 IRlsdRBGdX8/M6gPgLAy2m2eEeNgrwEA/xcWgfvZhI7CILSfvXDNKfGvnzg0mRHp
 cssYtKTACwzE3/uJUA8lX+HAWNrb1aijEUlvfK5K9CMYwP9wFXzXy1eI2kJ4Yzvx
 aqiK1vvieAl4gbLAoCD513nSxCQaUzpuHJvELA6bVa8uJ5GtWcuCA9U8qn8zcaaG
 tOmC/kF/+5jNwc4/4wCSHhcQD+1qaXZVQjeMBYsObqFv7ixabOlxVfGk/oDbAHEI
 BAtWsqHFMhQlo/E/YdH0palVhvslecnoAhTzURwL9231Sqp6ZeQl5ESya8ArmMFB
 SFeYMHtDhA557pA4G3R88IIVS+xWklNOVtcW1+c+YnW4d+Sb77aU9E78VKYmH0mt
 5rYB0ni09rcDBNRGUSy7fscfUV5ItJd/lccwjRGasM0LzZ6KoMWE2B0Cww5vG27W
 FXQ9hTsn1q92XY3AFiqR5IBiztNLZfjFEq6HAVSQrmXgHJ53ZT/0oFRcObYAsr49
 AjoLzkHcevdj7EUdm9q1o/KVk+t+bkDYjmb3kRgHVOwdekK/Jk8=
 =44ap
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Merge tag 'rust-rustfmt' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ojeda/linux

Pull rustfmt fixes from Miguel Ojeda:
 "Rust 'rustfmt' cleanup

  'rustfmt', by default, formats imports in a way that is prone to
  conflicts while merging and rebasing, since in some cases it condenses
  several items into the same line.

  Document in our guidelines that we will handle this for the moment
  with the trailing empty comment workaround and make the tree
  'rustfmt'-clean again"

* tag 'rust-rustfmt' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ojeda/linux:
  rust: bitmap: fix formatting
  rust: cpufreq: fix formatting
  rust: alloc: employ a trailing comment to keep vertical layout
  docs: rust: add section on imports formatting
This commit is contained in:
Linus Torvalds 2025-10-18 10:05:13 -10:00
commit 1c64efcb08
4 changed files with 83 additions and 5 deletions

View File

@ -38,6 +38,81 @@ Like ``clang-format`` for the rest of the kernel, ``rustfmt`` works on
individual files, and does not require a kernel configuration. Sometimes it may
even work with broken code.
Imports
~~~~~~~
``rustfmt``, by default, formats imports in a way that is prone to conflicts
while merging and rebasing, since in some cases it condenses several items into
the same line. For instance:
.. code-block:: rust
// Do not use this style.
use crate::{
example1,
example2::{example3, example4, example5},
example6, example7,
example8::example9,
};
Instead, the kernel uses a vertical layout that looks like this:
.. code-block:: rust
use crate::{
example1,
example2::{
example3,
example4,
example5, //
},
example6,
example7,
example8::example9, //
};
That is, each item goes into its own line, and braces are used as soon as there
is more than one item in a list.
The trailing empty comment allows to preserve this formatting. Not only that,
``rustfmt`` will actually reformat imports vertically when the empty comment is
added. That is, it is possible to easily reformat the original example into the
expected style by running ``rustfmt`` on an input like:
.. code-block:: rust
// Do not use this style.
use crate::{
example1,
example2::{example3, example4, example5, //
},
example6, example7,
example8::example9, //
};
The trailing empty comment works for nested imports, as shown above, as well as
for single item imports -- this can be useful to minimize diffs within patch
series:
.. code-block:: rust
use crate::{
example1, //
};
The trailing empty comment works in any of the lines within the braces, but it
is preferred to keep it in the last item, since it is reminiscent of the
trailing comma in other formatters. Sometimes it may be simpler to avoid moving
the comment several times within a patch series due to changes in the list.
There may be cases where exceptions may need to be made, i.e. none of this is
a hard rule. There is also code that is not migrated to this style yet, but
please do not introduce code in other styles.
Eventually, the goal is to get ``rustfmt`` to support this formatting style (or
a similar one) automatically in a stable release without requiring the trailing
empty comment. Thus, at some point, the goal is to remove those comments.
Comments
--------

View File

@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ use super::{
};
use crate::{
fmt,
page::AsPageIter,
page::AsPageIter, //
};
use core::{
borrow::{Borrow, BorrowMut},

View File

@ -167,7 +167,9 @@ impl core::ops::Deref for BitmapVec {
let ptr = if self.nbits <= BITS_PER_LONG {
// SAFETY: Bitmap is represented inline.
#[allow(unused_unsafe, reason = "Safe since Rust 1.92.0")]
unsafe { core::ptr::addr_of!(self.repr.bitmap) }
unsafe {
core::ptr::addr_of!(self.repr.bitmap)
}
} else {
// SAFETY: Bitmap is represented as array of `unsigned long`.
unsafe { self.repr.ptr.as_ptr() }
@ -184,7 +186,9 @@ impl core::ops::DerefMut for BitmapVec {
let ptr = if self.nbits <= BITS_PER_LONG {
// SAFETY: Bitmap is represented inline.
#[allow(unused_unsafe, reason = "Safe since Rust 1.92.0")]
unsafe { core::ptr::addr_of_mut!(self.repr.bitmap) }
unsafe {
core::ptr::addr_of_mut!(self.repr.bitmap)
}
} else {
// SAFETY: Bitmap is represented as array of `unsigned long`.
unsafe { self.repr.ptr.as_ptr() }

View File

@ -38,8 +38,7 @@ use macros::vtable;
const CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN: usize = bindings::CPUFREQ_NAME_LEN as usize;
/// Default transition latency value in nanoseconds.
pub const DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS: u32 =
bindings::CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
pub const DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS: u32 = bindings::CPUFREQ_DEFAULT_TRANSITION_LATENCY_NS;
/// CPU frequency driver flags.
pub mod flags {